Saturday, January 24, 2015
Starting OVER
Hi Bloggers and visitors
I need to write a update since I have been silent for a while. I been learning a LOT of NEW INFORMATION.
Thankful for the following people , Matthew Boylan , Eric Dubay , many more you tube pages and friends I have met along the way. The new information is amazing and gives me a sense of relief. There were massive lies that had to be left behind. First lie is the Earth is round WHOOPS no way check out what Matthew and Eric have posted at you tube!
There are a lot of things that people need to hear like Vaccinations ARE WORTHLESS and PURE POISON WHY ARE YOU POISONING YOUR CHILD? Put the time in if your going to be a parent to study what is IN the poison they want you to allow into the newborns blood. This blog is rededicated to my future grandchild. I wish you all the very best. Aho
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Who controls EVERYTHING?
This is a post I got from a page and all credit goes to the writer of the post. Thanks for telling the TRUTH
There are two operant Crowns in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II.
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederic Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion (today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is estimated at around $500 trillion).
Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown.
The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of Court.
They are: the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln's Inn and Gray's Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is called to their Bar.
The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.
The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America.
To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter 'S,' denotes a legal entity of the Crown.
At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown.
There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown.
Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed.
The Warranty Deed is only a 'color of title.' Color of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.
The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the populace.
Another ruse used to hoodwink natural persons is by enfranchisement. Those cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital letters means that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a corporation.
A 'juristic personality' has been created, and you have entered into multi-variant agreements that place you in an equity relationship with the Crown.
These invisible contracts include, birth certificates, citizenship records, employment agreements, driver's licenses and bank accounts. It is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by American judges. If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the contract.
Tax protestors and (the coming) draft resistors trying to renounce the parts of these contracts that they now disagree with will not profit by resorting to tort law (fairness) arguments as justification. Judges will reject these lines of defense as they have no bearing on contract law jurisprudence. Tort law governs grievances where no contract law is in effect.
These private agreements/contracts that bind us will always overrule the broad general clauses of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (the Constitution being essentially a renamed enactment of English common law). The Bill of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a 'bill of benefits,' conferred on us by them in anticipation of reciprocity (taxes).
Protestors and resistors will also lose their cases by boasting of citizenship status. Citizenship is another equity agreement that we have with the Crown. And this is the very juristic contract that Federal judges will use to incarcerate them. In the words of former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, "Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements."
"The balance of Title 42, section 1981 of the Civil Rights Code states," citizens shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind"
What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown's debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable income.
And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th amendment includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States, wherein all enfranchised persons (that's you) can be held personally liable for the Crown's debt.
The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial equity as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the gain wouldn't have been possible were in not for the Crown.
They view the system of interstate banks as their own property. Any profit or gain experienced by anyone with a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit card) carries with it - as an operation of law - the identical same full force and effect as if the Crown had created the gain.
Bank accounts fall outside the umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection because a commercial contract is in effect and the Bill of Rights cannot be held to interfere with the execution of commercial contracts. The Crown also views bank account records as their own private property, pursuant to the bank contract that each of us signed and that none of us ever read.
The rare individual who actually reads the bank contract will find that they agreed to be bound by Title 26 and under section 7202 agreed not to disseminate any fraudulent tax advice. This written contract with the Crown also acknowledges that bank notes are taxable instruments of commerce.
When we initially opened a bank account, another juristic personality was created. It is this personality (income and assets) that IRS agents are excising back to the Crown through taxation.
A lot of ink is being spilled currently over Social Security.
Possession of a Social Security Number is known in the Crown's lex as 'conclusive evidence' of our having accepted federal commercial benefits. This is another example of an equity relationship with the Crown.
Presenting one's Social Security Number to an employer seals our status as taxpayers, and gives rise to liability for a reciprocal quid pro quo payment of taxes to the Crown.
Through the Social Security Number we are accepting future retirement endowment benefits. Social Security is a strange animal. If you die, your spouse gets nothing, but rather, what would have gone to you is divided (forfeited) among other premium payers who haven't died yet.
But the Crown views failure to reciprocate in any of these equity attachments as an act of defilement and will proceed against us with all due prejudice.
For a person to escape the tentacles of the Crown octopus, a thoroughgoing study of American jurisprudence is required. One would have to be deemed a 'stranger to the public trust,' forfeit all enfranchisement benefits and close all bank accounts, among other things.
Citizenship would have to be made null and forfeit and the status of 'denizen' enacted. If there are any persons extant who have passed through this fire, I would certainly appreciate hearing from them.
The United States of America is a corporation, ruled by the British Crown and the Vatican
The USA is, and always has been, a huge corporation ruled from abroad. Its initial name was the Virginia Company and it is owned by the British Crown and the Vatican, who receive their yearly share of the profits.
The US presidents are appointed CEO's (they are not elected by us!), and their allegiance is to the "board of directors," not to the American citizens. We are seen as employees of the company and voting is designed as a distraction meant to offer us the illusion that we have a say in all this.
"In 1606 [King] James set up the Virginia Company which was granted Royal authority to begin settlements in the province of Virginia, named after Elizabeth I, who had been popularly called the Virgin Queen. The Union Jack first flew on American soil at Jamestown in Virginia as a permanent fixture in the spring of 1607...
"The early members of the Virginia Company were aristocrats who supported the Church of England and the Royalist cause. They included Lord Southampton, the Earl of Pembroke, the Earl of Montgomery, the Earl of Salisbury, the Earl of Northampton, and Sir Francis Bacon...
"As chancellor of England, Bacon was able to persuade the king to issue the charters which enabled the new colonies to proliferate in the new world...
"The Virginia Company members who actually settled in America included several members of the Bacon family, and friends of his who were initiates of the Rosy Cross." -- Michael Howard - Occult Conspiracy (quoted by Michael Tsarion)
"I understand from contacts in America that it is through organizations like the London Metal Exchange that profits from the Virginia Company (United States of America) are channeled back to London."-- David Icke - The Biggest Secret;
"The House of Burgesses was formed in Jamestown in 1619. It was the first representative legislative body in the American Colonies. The House passed measures designed to help the company prosper. But a serious Indian uprising in Jamestown in 1622 caused the adventurers to lose what little interest they had left. In 1623, King James decided that the company was being managed poorly. He took over the association in 1624 and dissolved the company." -- World Book Encyclopedia;
"Its shareholders were Londoners, and it was distinguished from the Plymouth Company, which was chartered at the same time and composed largely of men from Plymouth.
"In 1619 the company established continental America’s first true legislature, the General Assembly, which was organized bicamerally. It consisted of the governor and his council, named by the company in England, and the House of Burgesses, made up of two burgesses from each of the four boroughs and seven plantations.
"...The court ruled against the Virginia Company, which was then dissolved, with the result that Virginia was transformed into a royal colony."-- Encyclopedia Britannica;
"This means that all the rights which applied to the owners of the Virginia Company to the gold, silver, minerals and duties, mined and paid in America, still apply to the British families who own the United States of America and the lands of the united states of America.
"Those same percentages have been paid since ‘independence’ and are still being paid by the American people via their federal officials who are, in fact, officials of the Virginia Company - yes, including the President.
"...But here’s yet another twist. Who owns the assets apparently owned by the Virginia Company? Answer: the Vatican."-- David Icke - The Biggest Secret;
"After the original 13 (again!) American colonies won their ‘independence’ and an ‘independent’ country was formed after 1783, the Virginia Company simply changed its name to... the United States of America.
"You see there are two USAs, or rather a USA and a usA. The united states of America with a lower case ‘u’ and ‘s’ are the lands of the various states. These lands, as we have seen, are still owned by the British Crown as the head of the old Virginia Company, although there is something to add about this in a moment.
"Then there is the United States of America, capital ‘U’ and ‘S’, which is the 68 square miles of land west of the Potomac River on which is built the federal capital, Washington DC and the District of Columbia. It also includes the US protectorates of Guam and Puerto Rico.
"The United States of America is not a country, it is a corporation owned by the same Brotherhood reptilian bloodlines who owned the Virginia Company, because the USA is the Virginia Company!"-- David Icke - The Biggest Secret;
"In 1604, a group of leading politicians, businessmen, merchants, manufacturers and bankers, met in Greenwich, then in the English county of Kent, and formed a corporation called the Virginia Company in anticipation of the imminent influx of white Europeans, mostly British at first, into the North American continent.
"Its main stockholder was the reptilian, King James I, and the original charter for the company was completed by April 10th 1606. This and later updates to the charter established the following:
"...The Virginia Company comprised of two branches, the London Company and the Plymouth or New England Company...The ‘Pilgrims’ of American historical myth were, in fact, members of the second Virginia Company branch called the New England Company. The Pilgrim Society is still a major elite grouping within the Illuminati..
"The Virginia Company owned most of the land of what we now call the USA, and any lands up to 900 miles offshore. This included Bermuda and most of what is now known as the Caribbean Islands.
"The Virginia Company (the British Crown and the bloodline families) had rights to 50%, yes 50%, of the ore of all gold and silver mined on its lands, plus percentages of other minerals and raw materials, and 5% of all profits from other ventures.
"These rights, the charters detailed, were to be passed on to all heirs of the owners of the Virginia Company and therefore continue to apply... forever!
"The controlling members of the Virginia Company who were to enjoy these rights became known as the Treasurer and Company of Adventurers and Planters of the City of London.
"After the first 21 years from the formation of the Virginia Company, all ‘duties, imposts, and excises’ paid on trading activities in the colonies had to be paid directly to the British Crown through the Crown treasurer...
"The lands of the Virginia Company were granted to the colonies under a Deed of Trust (on lease) and therefore they could not claim ownership of the land...
"The monarch, through his Council for the Colonies, insisted that members of the colonies impose the Christian religion on all the people, including the Native Americans...
"The criminal courts on the lands of the Virginia Company were to be operated under Admiralty Law, the law of the sea, and the civil courts under common law, the law of the land... Now, get this. All of the above still applies today!"-- David Icke - The Biggest Secret;
The United States Inc.
England, Canada, Australia and many other countries are led politically by “Prime Ministers” to the Queen. In fact she is the official head of 123 commonwealth countries. America, Russia, and other countries, however, have a “President” and “Vice-President.”
Usually corporations have Presidents and Vice-Presidents. What does this mean? The US Presidents rule from the “White House.” The Russian Presidents also rule from the White House. The Jesuits, a large force behind the Illuminati, have their own White House as well. England is ruled from “Whitehall.”
"The United States government is being ruled from the ‘White House,’ the government of England is being ruled from what is called ‘Whitehall,’ and Whitehall, like our White House, is the symbol of power because the hall is like the Masonic hall, the lodge hall, the union hall.” -- Jordan Maxwell - Matrix of Power;
"For those who think America controls the roost it would do well to consider that the Queen of England is still the official head of Commonwealth (123 countries) and the official monarch of Australia and Canada along with the United Kingdom... add to that the fact that all Bush Sr. got for his two terms as president of USA is a mere knighthood of the British Empire." -- Prash Trivedi;
The original 13 colonies were actually called companies. Military units are also called companies. We sing patriotic songs like “the Star-Spangled Banner” but a banner is a corporate advertisement, not a flag.
You surrender with a white flag, no colors. When you get mad you show your true colors. If you just won independence in a bloody revolution with Britain would you choose the same three colors for your new US flag?
Why does “every heart ring true for the red, white, and blue?” What about the gold-fringed flag used by the military, hung at all courts, schools, and government buildings? It all has to do with the British Maritime Admiralty Law of Flags.
Barack Obama is the current CEO of the USA Corporation and
the gold-fringed flags in the background stand for "ruled from abroad."
“This is also known as British Maritime (military) Law and this is why the American flag always has a gold fringe when displayed in the courts of the United States. You find the same in government buildings and federally funded schools.
"The gold fringe is a legal symbol indicating that the court is sitting under British Maritime Law and the Uniform Commercial Code - military and merchant law not common or constitutional law, under the Admiralty Law of Flags, the flag displayed gives notice of the law under which the ship (in this case the court) is regulated.
"Anyone entering that ship (court) accepts by doing so that they are submitting to the law indicated by that flag. Judges refuse to replace the flag with one without a fringe when asked by defendants who know the score because that changes the law under which the court is sitting.
"If you appear in a court with a gold fringed flag your constitutional rights are suspended and you are being tried under British Maritime (military /merchant) Law.” -- David Icke - Tales from the Time Loop;
International Maritime Admiralty law, the law of the high seas, began in Sumeria, was perfected in Rome and continues to this day. Jordan Maxwell has explained that the way we trade commerce today is modeled after the Masons’/Templar Knights’ 1,000 year old system.
Notice how regardless of whether you send a product by air, water, or land - you “ship” it. The ship pulls into its “berth” and ties to the “dock.” The Captain has to provide the port authorities with a “certificate of manifest” declaring the products he has brought.
Through a legal loophole the royals have created, US citizens are considered property of the queen under British Maritime law. Since we are born of our mother’s water, from her “birth canal,” we are thereby a maritime product, a “shipped” commodity. Our mothers were delivering a product under maritime law and that’s why we are born in a “delivery room.”
That’s why the “doc” signs your “berth” certificate, your “certificate of manifest.” You’re kept in the Maternity “Ward.” Why a ward? No other hospital areas are called wards. Prisons have wards and wardens.
The United States Corporation came about just after the civil war. The Act of 1871 was passed by congress creating a separate form of government for DC, essentially turning it into a corporation.
It was decided that employees would be called “citizens.” So when you say in court or on paper, that you are a citizen of the United States, you are not a free American, but an employee of US Inc.
When you get a fine, a ticket, a bill, or get sued, you must sign in all capital letters. When you die your Masonic tombstone by law will have all capital letters to show their employee has died.
The entity that is your name in all caps is your maritime admiralty product code. Upper and lower case legally represents you, your body.
“The Uniform Commercial Code was approved by the American Bar Association, which is a franchise, a subordinate branch, of the British legal system and its hierarchy based in London's Temple Bar (named after the Illuminati Knights Templar secret society).
As I have been writing for many years, the power that controls America is based in Britain and Europe because that is where the power is located that owns the United States Corporation. By the way, if you think it is strange that a court on dry land could be administered under Maritime Law, look at US Code, Title 18 B 7.
It says that Admiralty Jurisdiction is applicable in the following locations: (1) the high seas; (2) any American ship; (3) any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by consent of the legislature of the state.
In other words, mainland America. All this is founded on Roman law because the Illuminati have been playing this same game throughout the centuries wherever they have gone. The major politicians know that this is how things are and so do the government administrators, judges, lawyers and insider 'journalists'.
Those who realize what is happening and ask the court for the name of the true creditor or recipients of the fines imposed by the 'legal system' are always refused this information by the judge.
The true creditors in such cases, and the ultimate recipient of the fines, are the bankers to which the corporation 'country' is bankrupt.” -- David Icke - Tales from the Time Loop;
Lawyers or “barristers” have to take the Bar Association “bar” exam just as alcoholics go to the “bar,” sugar-junkies eat candy “bars,” and gamblers hope to get 3 “bars” on the slot machine. These all derive from the Templar’s turn of the 13th century “Temple Bar” in England.
Originally the Temple Bar was literally just a bar or chain between two posts next to the Temple law courts. This soon became a huge stone gate and there were eventually eight of these gates built so the elites could restrict / control trade within the city of London.
They were taken down during 19th century, but then each stone was numbered and kept in storage until 2004 when they just re-built the Temple Bar in London.
“The United States corporation was created behind the screen of a 'Federal Government' when, after the manufactured 'victory' in the American War of 'Independence', the British colonies exchanged overt dictatorship from London with the far more effective covert dictatorship that has been in place ever since.
In effect, the Virginia Company, the corporation headed by the British Crown that controlled the 'former' colonies, simply changed its name to the United States and other related pseudonyms.
These include the US, USA, United States of America, Washington DC, District of Columbia, Federal Government and 'Feds'. The United States Corporation is based in the District of Columbia and the current president of the corporation is a man called George W. Bush.
He is not the president of the people or the country as they are led to believe, that's just the smokescreen. This means that Bush launched a 'war on terrorism' on behalf of a private corporation to further the goals of that corporation.
It had nothing to do with' America' or 'Americans' because these are very different legal entities. It is the United States Corporation that owns the United States military and everything else that comes under the term 'federal'.
This includes the Federal Reserve, the 'central bank' of the United States, which is, in reality, a private bank owned by controlling stockholders (and controllers of the US Corporation) that are not even American. This is the bank from which the United States Corporation borrows 'money'.” -- David Icke - Tales from the Time Loop;
The Greater British Empire Map
The Shocking Truth About Your Birth Certificate
“If you notice on the bottom of your birth certificate it says Department of Commerce. It is a property of the Department of Commerce because you are nothing more than a piece of commercial material. That’s why if you’re out of work you don’t go to the unemployment office, you go to the Office of Human Resources, because you’re just a human resource.” -- Jordan Maxwell, 1990 Slideshow Presentation on Hidden Symbols;
The Judge sits on the bench for the bank. Banks are on both sides of a river. A river bank directs the flow of the current/sea - the currency, the cash flow. The current-sea is “deposited” from bank to bank down the river.
We’re just “consumers” to advertise to, just “human resources” to be used up like batteries, and they are the “social engineers,” molding us “useless eaters” into wage slavery. - See more at: http://humansarefree.com/2014/09/the-top-of-pyramid-rothschilds-british.html#sthash.Z7CFGe6Y.dpuf
Monday, February 27, 2012
A Fishy Tale
Any investigator worth his salt would have picked up the inconsistencies in this fishy tale. Never mind. At least we now know for certain the whole system had been rigged right from the start. The perpetrators of the crime will never be hauled up for prosecution. We live at the mercy of those in power. Of all the preposterous lies spewed to make this planned event appear accidental, this fishy eye-witness account of 4 guys on an all-night fishing trip to the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) takes the cake, from head to toe and from visual to sound. Not only is regulatory enforcement blind, so is the crime investigation. In fact the crime scene was surrendered wholesale to the criminals to do as they please. Law enforcement took a step backwards. It kept independent observers at bay. Something Nazi Germany or any present day Authoritarian regime would have done, but not America; land of the brave and free. It is indeed a far cry from the days America stands for the morally upright, Freedom and Democracy.
With so many holes in the fishy tale, why would BP even consider putting out the story in the first place, let alone sponsored the tall tale all over the internet and main stream media? We are all suckers for a good accidental Joe-Public turned hero/famous storyline. Hollywood had been honing their skills for the last 8 decades. But why hire outsiders to the front row seats of the crime scene? It wouldn't be a surprise at all if at least one of them was connected to the oil industry.
We can think of many but would like to keep BP guessing how much and how far we had penetrated into their pile of BS. The general public need to understand 2 things:
1.When there is a total blackout of information, truth or speculations will fill up the void. BP had to fill up the cyberspace (before anyone else) with their version of twisted truth. To their advantage, of course. Propaganda can't get any better than this.
2.Like all reality shows, public feed backs were important to monitor their deception. BP couldn't jolly well run a Gallup poll on CNN, can't they? Besides knowing how intoxicated the public was with the toxic lies, they also needed to adjust the evolving story. The more criticisms, the better, for them to adjust the legal loop holes and thus limit their future financial obligations. While loose pieces of the jigsaw puzzle were in play, the distorted “truth” could still be adjusted to escape prosecution. By the time the main street public wakes up to the corexit, FEMA camps will be well and ready to keep dissidents in check.
•
It is for reason no. 2, our articles on the eye-witnesses accounts were kept secret. The constant changing of the time-zone at Gcaptain.com after our articles were published and discussed on Facebook, not only confirms the ever shifting goal posts but also the “cyber-spying”. We have to have the last laugh on this. Even technological giants and bullies fell for it.
911-II Caught Sleeping On The Job Or Part Of A Contrived Plot To Blow Up Dwh
BP's Post Blowout Blueprint Before Incident Confirms Inside Job
An Eye Witness Account Of DWH Explosion Fire 10 Miles Away
One Day Later Gcaptain Switched Time Zone To JST 9GMT, Why?
Doctored Photo Of Fishy Fishing Trip To DWH On The Night Of Explosion
Joking aside, this is only a minor score point. Their battle is to escape culpability. Like a fish caught in a net, no amount of adjustment now can free them from the net of truth. As Gcaptain.com found out, it would look utterly ridiculous for Anchorman's posting “it's 0130 in the morning now” if the time of post was 1:30 pm in the afternoon. With tails between their hind legs, Gcaptain had to admit defeat and adjust back to their normal time zone.
The court of public justice (ridicule) can be suppressed temporarily but not forever.
No crime can be so perfect as to leave no trail. There is thus, a need for mass deception in such a high profile crime. Although somebody did notice the transcripts of item A, his/her lone voice of suspicion was quickly drowned out. Why wasn't this piece of evidence investigated deeper. After 2 years, nothing was ever heard of this “explosion three hours before the rig went up in flames in a second, larger explosion”. Either there was an explosion or the transcripts were part of a contrived plot. If it was the latter, it definitely explains the “scripted screen play” so typical of Hollywood movies.
NEW ORLEANS (AP) - The Coast Guard says a crew member from an oil platform that sank off Louisiana reported an initial explosion three hours before the rig went up in flames in a second, larger explosion. Coast Guard Senior Chief Petty Officer Mike O'Berry says the first blast was reported at 7 p.m. CDT Tuesday. Later, the rig sent an emergency signal. O'Berry says a nearby rig at the same time reported the Deepwater Horizon was in flames. He says the rig didn't ask for help during the initial call. The Coast Guard sent help after the emergency signal came. The Coast Guard is investigating what happened during that three hours. A spokesman for the rig owner says any logged events are part of the investigation. AP: Oil rig reported explosion 3 hours before fire Apr 22 08:29pm EST
The scripted plot was too damn accurate to be just a fictional message written by some bored personnel working on the rig. It could not be a minor explosion incident since the scripted plot detailed out a complete rig abandonment. You do not abandon a $300 million rig for a minor fire. If it was a safety or SAR drill, you do not plan for casualties or unavoidable collateral damages. You do that for a strategic military assault to achieve certain political or economic advantage.
In peace time, we can't think of anything else except that the oil spill disaster was planned for several sinister objectives. Watch out for more articles how this can be achieved through planned disasters. Their acceptable collateral damage? Up to 15 crewmen, excluding the gulf coast victims and marine wildlife (they are part of their sinister objectives). So 4 crewmen were extremely lucky. Wonder who? They should know themselves. Their personal safety can never be assured for long.
You play with the devil, you will be sent to hell as soon as your role is over. No one ever believes the aircraft tragedies of Jim Black (BP Spill Commander) and Ted Stevens (ex Senator who had BP's files) were accidental. Just because Joe Public doesn't talk about it, doesn't mean he believes in it. Similarly, there is a wide mistrust between industry workers and their employers. That sacred trust had been broken decades ago.
Why would outsiders be brought into the crime scene as eye-witnesses when there were hundreds of workers and first responders at site? It is because they couldn't trust any of the workers to talk. The number of first responders turned problem eye-witnesses in 911 taught them a lesson. Would you tell the truth if one of your buddies perished in a planned accident?
We have studied BK's claims of being set up by his employer. To have escape so many potentially fatal “accidents” is nothing short of miracle. Amen! There are certainly merits to his cases. Isn't it too much of a coincidence for an ROV captain who had worked at the Macondo site to be killed by a great white while his buddies escaped? Even if he wasn't going to spill the beans in his Christmas home coming, there would always be uneasy feelings of knowing too much. Any surprise many had gone underground?
More than a dozen accidental deaths cannot be coincidental. Keeping quiet can be hazardous to your health. Dead men tell no tales. This a fact. Dance with the devil and you dance in hell.
By itself, Anchorman's surprisingly accurate Gcaptain posts (despite being 10 miles away from the crime scene) could be dismissed as wild guesses despite the astronomical odds. But with AP's report of an explosion 3 hours before the “accident”, coincidences can become serious evidence. Couple these two with the transcripts labeled A to D, you start to have a very credible proof of an inside job. If the fishy tale of the fishing trip to DWH on the night of explosion stands up to scrutiny, you at least have a score of 3 to 1. But with a score of 4-0, well that is something else. With BK's pieces of incriminating evidence (physics of impossibilities), the score must be an astounding 50-0. You have to admit this is truly a tilted Justice Scale by any standard. We leave it to your sense of justice whether the following fishy tale is indeed fishy (0 points to BP).
Of all the lies, the fishy tale of a fishy trip of a lifetime to DWH on the night of explosion has to be the most preposterous. You simply cannot have 200 invited guests for a funeral and yet claim the death to be purely accidental. It can't get more ridiculous than that. Yet the world is blissfully asleep because it is not their turn at the funeral pyre yet.
Greece can't be their ultimate target. 911 which was allegedly planned and executed by Al Qaeda on 11 Sept 2001 was an Inside Job. The 2003 Bam-Iran, 2004 Tsunami-USS San Francisco, 2006 Taiwan quakes were not natural disasters. They had been planned for years only to be triggered on 26 December at precisely 26 minutes after the hour.
Well the 2004 quake missed or triggered early, resulting in a badly damaged USS San Francisco nuclear submarine. Isn't this proof that the time of detonation is of critical importance as Kollmann had highlighted in his research? Why do you think the 311 Fukushima quake hit exactly on the same minute after the hour as the first plane (or drone or missile or whatever) that hit Tower 1. If you are still asleep and have not not smelled the corexit yet, then your time will come soon enough. As Dr Rikki Ott (herself a victim of the Exxon Valdez oil spill) repeatedly said, “educate yourself”. There is absolutely no way you can survive what is going to come, by burying your head in the sand.
First they came for the Communists but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists but I was not one of them, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews but I was not Jewish so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.” ~Martin Niemoeller
With the corroborating evidence of the fishy tale of 4 students who went fishing at DWH on the night of the explosion, there can be no further doubt the 20 April 2010 explosion was a contrived plot at the highest level. And the scary part? There will be more coming when the first line of resistance is gone. Quit escaping from reality by “innocently” asking why.
False evidence is a doubt edge sword.
How could Anchorman be so accurate on events that were not yet made known in the first few hours of the disaster? And yet be so wrong on details which could have been verified or repeated broadcast over the news media? If he was completely accurate on all accounts, it would have aroused suspicions. Thus, he was deliberately fed wrong information where it did not matter. In all probability Anchorman might not have known head or tail of the contrived plot.
As a respected sea captain and a vivid blogger (top contributor at Gcaptain) he was narrowed down as the best avenue to disseminate BP's half-facts. It was better he did not know the whole story except only the key details. As we have seen in Kollmann's article “Natural Accidental Disasters Timed To Happen?”, to avoid real accidents on the ground and to allow sufficient time for their agents to get to a safe distance from ground zero, the vital triggered time had to be known. Now you know why Guilliani avoided WTC-7 in the 911 disaster, 15 minutes before it collapsed completely from “unknown causes”. Anchorman's mistake was similar to BBC and Fox News announcing the collapse of WTC-7 minutes before it collapsed. How could they have known beforehand unless it was preplanned?
See BBC & FoxNews shocking Collapse News Forecasters In 911
So 126 personnel onboard (POB) became 144 or 160. Perhaps the extra 14 also included the Schlumberger crew who unexpectedly flew off on a “demand” chopper flight. What did they know to demand an instant flight out? Obviously, there was no explosion at 18:57 CDT. So how could there be transcripts of an explosion of unknown causes 3 hours before it happened? Item A clearly stated the crew had abandoned rig and “87 POB” had been picked up after the explosion event. This “planned explosion” was no small matter but a disastrous one that required all the crew to abandon rig. Is that why Anchorman posted on Gcaptain.com exactly 49 minutes after the actual blowout (which was invisible to him, 10 miles away) that “all have abandon ship”. As we tear through all these eye-witness accounts, it is obvious all of them were mere actors playing to the scripted plot.
A. 202357Z APR 10 (18:57 CDT 20 Apr 10)
INITIAL CIC BRIEF// D8 RECVD DSC FROM MOBILE DRILLING UNIT DEEPWATER HORIZON OF AN EXPLOSION ON BOARD. THERE WERE 144 POB. CAUSE OF EXPLOSION UNKNOWN. THERE IS A 285' WORKBOAT AND 2 LIFE RAFTS ON SCENE. 87 POB HAVE BEN RECVD AND ARE ON THE 285' WORKBOAT. 2 H-65'S FROM A/S NOLA, H-65, H-60 AND C-144 FROM ATC MOBILE LAUNCHED AS WELL AS CGC POMPANO AND CGC RAZORBLEL. SEVERAL GOOD SAM'S ALSO RESPONDING. THE RIG COMPANY IS TRANSOCEAN; D8 IS TRYING TO GET MORE INFORMATION FROM THEM. RIG WAS 72NM SE VENICE LA IN POS 28-44N 088-21W. // FOLLOW UP CIC WILL BE AT 0445Z.
No matter how good the actors, there will always be bloopers.
To understand the blunders highlighted here, please refer to the mudinmyblood.net/forum/showthread.php?t=6104 where the story first appeared and the CBS interview at cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6490138n&tag=related;photovideo.
Firstly, what is the chance of an impromptu fishing trip coinciding with an accidental blowout down to the exact date and hour? Noticed that the four witnesses claimed the blowout happened at around 10 pm but there was no mention of him or his buddies looking at their time. Anyone who had experienced a gas blowout within 100 yards of the derrick in a small launch at sea would have panicked, cut and run. Yet they stayed on for 4 minutes to observe the “light went out and came on again seconds before the explosion”. How did they know the rig was about to blow up in flames when the lights went off?
Another major flaw in the fishy eye-witness account has been their claim that they were that close to the rig. Unless US offshore and BP safety regulations were way below third world lax regulation and enforcement, would the captains of MV D Bankston and DWH allow any Tom, Dick or Harry fishing boat to park so near them, especially with the work vessel connected with an umbilical to receive the drilling mud from DWH. The launch could have been a terrorists' boat loaded with explosives. Didn't the control bridges of both vessels care at all or at least logged in their “displeasure” warnings?
Just like the “explosion 3 hours before”, it must have been a “phantom boat”, good enough for a fiction or Hollywood movie but failed muster inspection. And the USCG let it pass? This is no longer a conspiracy theory but a factual conspiracy. Not by the terrorists but by the highest authority in the government in cahoot with the oil company.
Look for the hidden mega windfalls in connection with the trillions of fake US treasury bonds. Fake bonds with millions or billion in denomination values, are useless except for use as collateral for short term borrowed funds. And what use would these short term borrowed funds be if not to bet against certain high odds rigged in their favor. To make big gains you have to bet on the impossible. The term “impossible” means you will lose your pants even for the first time unless you know for certain the one-to-million chance event will happen within a certain period, months ahead. So for those who kept asking “why”, please continue to bury your heads in the sand. Odds are, you will lose them in the next mega planned disaster.
Sail out 50 miles for an impromptu fishing trip without radar, navigation aids and front flood lights?
Without radar and navigation aids, could some casual fishing buddies on an impromptu boat trip have reached DWH 50 miles out in the open sea. Could a 26 footer launch have sufficient fuel for the return trip? Another giveaway was the time they left the dock; “@3pm”. Isn't that a bit precise? A 4½ hour trip to reach DWH at 07:30pm well before the planned event. What did DWH have to offer? The “expected fireworks”? Even by American brand of adventurism and rashness, it just doesn't make sense. If it was really an impromptu fishing trip why didn't they choose a closer platform at shallower water? Why head for DWH when there were tens of other nearer rigs? Platforms with legs attract more fishes than semi-subs with no legs. No active offshore platforms (drilling or production) in the world would allow unauthorized approach without prior notification, let alone allow it to latched on to its pontoon. Isn't America serious on their War on Terror?
In all likelihood, the “uninvited” fishing boat would have been chased away. If they were indeed close range eye-witnesses, they were there by invitation to observe and to record the planned fireworks. Alternatively, they might not even be at the crime site. They were merely given the video clips/photos and paid to lie. Whatever the true story was or arrangements made, this fishy tale is one more proof the blowout was an orchestrated plot with Bollywood-grade reality.
Some other discrepancies in their testimony and video itself
Uploaded by aandryiii1 on May 26, 2010 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1eLHGblEww
Ryan Chaisson, Wes Bourg, Dustin King, and myself, Albert Andry were fishing this rig right before it exploded. We were fishing the leg of it when we noticed rushing water coming down the derek, Gas began BLOWING out the side of it and we ran from the rig. It exploded seconds later. We got to a safe distance and this is what we recorded. You can see more at WWW.KNIGHTRYDERZ.COM
You can't fake background noise short of muting it and completely voice over it.
Up to minute 0.15, the video was silent (muted). When the background noise was turned on, it is too noisy to be a motor launch with its outboard engine shut off. You should be able to hear the clear sound of water flapping against the sides of the boat rather than the generator or machinery noise found in bigger, 300 footer supply vessels. The video was obviously recorded at the upper decks to get a better view. This explains the absence of water sound and higher wind noise. If the video was taken at water level (as in Anchorman's shot) there would be no “reflection trails” in the water leading to the burning rig (something to do with the angle of reflection ~BK).
The wind sound in the background was fairly strong and yet the voice of the cameramen was so clear as if it was a voice-over recording in a studio. A sound spectra analysis would be able to confirm this. With the strong wind sound and the calm but rolling water (before zooming in) the camera viewport should be more jerky on a small 26 footer. With the zoom in, it would be impossible to get a steady view of the burning rig unless the video was recorded onboard a steady platform like the deck of a supply vessel in calm water.
At minute 1:40, there was the unmistakable captain's instruction on the loud speaker to his crew at the back deck. The video had to be recorded close to the loudspeaker on a vessel bigger than Andry's 26 footer (where no loudspeaker was required).
Extra: Capturing The Disaster May 16, 2010 4:16 Pm
Albert Andry, Dustin King, Ryan Chaisson & Westley Bourg describe the explosions on the oil rig Deepwater Horizon. Chaisson began videotaping the scene almost as soon as the disaster began.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6490138n&tag=related;photovideo
“Began videotaping as soon as the disaster began” means at the time of the blowout at 21:45 CDT. They did not speed off until seconds before the explosion. A comparison of a snapshot taken from Chaisson's video recording with Anchorman's photo, suggests that “safe distance” to be between 6 to 8 miles.
The boat was stationary (from video shot) and amazingly steady for a small rocking boat which had just sped away from the exploding rig. It would have taken 30 minutes to travel 5 n.mi at 10 knots. Further a boat on water does not stop even after the engines are shut down. It glides for tens of minutes before coming to a standstill. Thus for the camera to start rolling at a stationary position (on a small boat) it would have to be at least 40 minutes. Chaisson's video would have started recording at the earliest 22:30 CDT (40 minutes after 21:50). Forty minutes after the blowout cannot be construed as “began videotaping as soon as the disaster began” in any sense of the phrase.
Forty minutes would be too long to capture the first explosion as Chaisson had claimed. If at all he was recording, we would be seeing a jerky, motion (speeding away) recording of the exploding rig. Without doubt the video was recorded from a stable stationary vessel watching the explosion from a safe distance (7-8 miles?). That vessel had to move out at least 20-30 minutes before the explosion started. No two ways about it. Alternatively if the MV D Bankston was that tiny dot next to the burning rig, then the video must have been taken on another vessel in the vicinity.
Now, the question is, how many vessels were out there within 10 miles of DWH just before the blowout? Kind of strange to have all the funeral guests arriving in black mourning suites when it was supposed to be a surprised celebration party turned funeral? Elementary, my dear Watson.
“Around 10pm the entire center of the rig started rushing water downwards over all the pipes....I looked at my friend who previously worked offshore, and he said that’s BOP something another and the rig took a ‘kick!”
If the four buddies were really within 100 yards of the blowing well, it would be inconceivable for any first timer not to mention the “torrential rain of drilling mud falling on them”. For the experienced one to have said “BOP and the rig took a kick” meant he had experienced a blowout before. So why did he not scream to speed off until 4 minutes later, just seconds before the first explosion? The experienced instant expert analysis did not jive with the 4 minutes of inaction.
I thought the rig was sinking and that was their way of bilging… But nope! Methane gas began BLOWING out of the West side of it and the noise of the thrust was louder than anything I’ve ever herd (except for a sonic boom I herd once, and what I’m about to tell you next)
“rig was sinking”...this must have been in the script from the very start because there could not be any visible sign of sinking or even any feeling of it. They were on a small boat divorced from the rig, remember.
“Methane gas”...Wait a minute, how did 4 youngsters know instantly it was Methane, a colorless and odorless gas. And in the dark? They should be hit with drilling mud, sea water and other more visible drilling fluid first. For most layman, the first exclamation would be like “it is raining MUD” not invisible gas. Again this was scripted to imply the “naturalness or expectation” of the explosion that followed. Most blowouts do not end up in flames thanks to various safety and fire hazards prevention measures. Without the dramatic effects, no one would want to see any Hollywood movies. Without the implied presence of explosive gas, there would be more piercing questions on the actual causes of the initial explosions. Oh yeah, the ever important buzz words; spark, hissing gas sound, turned off power, prevent electrical spark, generator kicked in, ignite the gas.......WOW, amazing how a 24-year old student (at that time) could have analyzed all that in his “own eye-witness” account, in his very first blowout experience?
And then this interesting response Aandryiii made to someone’s question within the follow-up thread:
When the gas started blowing out the side of the rig they turned off the power to prevent electrical spark which would ignite the gas, but when they shut power the generator kicked on and thats all she wrote!
“At approximately 100 yds from the rig it Exploded!”
They were 100 yards from the rig at 21:49 CDT when the first explosion occurred. They were under the rig a full 4 minutes before taking off after the blowout occurred. If they had taken off at the instant of the blowout (at 21:45) and at 10 knots, they would have been 0.65 nmi or 1,300 yards from the exploding DWH. Is it not surprising for an ex-offshore worker (friend) who could analyze on the spot ….a well kick and BOP, vaporizing methane hydrate etc, to stick around a full 4 minutes before screaming to take off? Yet at such a short distance they were not hit with any falling debris and drilling mud. There is no telling what damage they could have suffered at such near distance. On the other hand, would they willingly risk their lives if they were told the truth. We bet our bottom dollar, the four buddies were not under the rig at the time of the blowout or the explosion.
So why did BP need 4 outsiders to masquerade as eye-witnesses at the crime scene?
In the first place, there would have been 126 potential eye-witnesses already. Why invent more from the outside? This is again another CYA strategy. There is no telling what the “uncontrolled eye-witnesses” could tell in public, or even under controlled situation. The key to holding eye-witnesses to ransom is to hold them on their hidden crime. By lying to the public, these four youngsters were forever beholden to take their secrets to their grave (natural or prematurely). Besides, it is easier to impose a blanket ban not only on the surviving crew but all who wish to continue working in the oil industry. If they permit some and not others to talk, everyone in the industry would know who the planted moles were on the ground. Why kill their golden goose and spoil the chance for another “accidental disaster” when future opportunity presents itself again? Industry agents are difficult to come by as they are not born everyday. At the present rate, expect several blowouts (side shows) to build up to a mega strike annually. Chances are another mega spill is brewing somewhere.
Other discrepancies and contradictions
In the CBS interview (May 16, 2010 4:16 pm), the four eye-witnesses gave an account of their narrow escape. In Anchorman's photo, you can see the moon and another vessel but no trailing water surface reflections to the camera position. So either the photos were taken at vastly different location or many hours apart when the position of the moon in the sky had changed significantly. The CBS interview stated that Chaisson began videotaping the scene almost as soon as the disaster began. How could they be so near (100 yards) and more than 5 miles at the same time? Again this could only have happened on paper but not on reality.
The video cameraman mis-spoke when he said his video caught the first explosion, pointing to the hovering mushroom clouds above the rig. The CBS interviewer (at 0.27min) corrected that there was no flame in the first explosion (blowout). Andry quickly covered the mistake by describing the hissing sound of the gas in the blowout. Again there was no mention of “raining mud around them” which any eye-witness within 100 yards would have experienced. There were flames in between the float pontoon and as far as 500ft from the drill derrick side. The 4 youngsters could not have possibly escaped without burns if they were indeed at the pontoon leg of the rig. In their eye-witness accounts, never once did they mention burns although they did “confess” to feeling the intense heat when asked.
How could the boat be speeding away until a safe distance (30 minutes away) and yet still caught the mushrooming cloud from the first few explosions? By the time the small boat steady itself, the explosions would have been gone. This means the video that caught the explosions were already a few miles away at a safe distance in anticipation of the initial explosions at 21:49 CDT (not the blowout at 21:45. No video of that has surfaced yet). The video posted by Andry could not have been taken on a small 26 footer. Period!
The rig blew a few more explosions after that and began to burn down. Some of the rig began dripping into the water and the platform tilted in and turned RED HOT.
The “ platform tilted in” phrase seems to be another prepared script. The tilting happened much later. “began to burn down” and “turned RED HOT.” do not go together. If anything the burning intensified at least for the next few hours as the fuel on board started to burn.
The guy who predicted the explosion was terrified of what would happen next and would not allow for us to get any closer than a mile. He told me things about air rising from the pipes below, and how the pipes could be below us since they run at angles under water, and how the explosions would continue. I think he knew what he was talking about and made us all worry… We stayed a mile off the fire and searched/listened for missing ppl for 4 hours.
“predicted the explosion” seems such a certainty when most blowouts do not end up with an explosion or fire.
The photo comparison suggests 7-8 miles with respect to Anchorman's declared distance of 10 miles. A mile off the rig would be too close. These four guys were not survivors of a deadly blast or heroes but paid liars. Most rig survival lifeboats were designed to withstand heat up to 1000 degrees C and to escape beyond the first mile radius of a burning rig. In such unprotected close proximity from the derrick, these foursome would have been roasted alive if not blown apart. The rig survivors (crew on board) jumped into the water only after explosions. Item EG at 211313Z CGC Zepher reported finding 2 burnt life raft with no signs of life or having POB in them at position 38-45.3N 088-21.2 W or 1.5 n.miles from well A location. If the “phantom” fishing boat had been within 100 yards at the time of explosion, they would have been “dead eye-witnesses”. And they were there for 4 hours, searching and listening for missing people without a scratch in their faces? Give me a break!
- a joint effort article by the gulf truth movement. Special thanks to BK Lim, Trisha James, Peter Frizzel, Jbao, Kollmann and other contributors who preferred not to be named.
With so many holes in the fishy tale, why would BP even consider putting out the story in the first place, let alone sponsored the tall tale all over the internet and main stream media? We are all suckers for a good accidental Joe-Public turned hero/famous storyline. Hollywood had been honing their skills for the last 8 decades. But why hire outsiders to the front row seats of the crime scene? It wouldn't be a surprise at all if at least one of them was connected to the oil industry.
We can think of many but would like to keep BP guessing how much and how far we had penetrated into their pile of BS. The general public need to understand 2 things:
1.When there is a total blackout of information, truth or speculations will fill up the void. BP had to fill up the cyberspace (before anyone else) with their version of twisted truth. To their advantage, of course. Propaganda can't get any better than this.
2.Like all reality shows, public feed backs were important to monitor their deception. BP couldn't jolly well run a Gallup poll on CNN, can't they? Besides knowing how intoxicated the public was with the toxic lies, they also needed to adjust the evolving story. The more criticisms, the better, for them to adjust the legal loop holes and thus limit their future financial obligations. While loose pieces of the jigsaw puzzle were in play, the distorted “truth” could still be adjusted to escape prosecution. By the time the main street public wakes up to the corexit, FEMA camps will be well and ready to keep dissidents in check.
•
It is for reason no. 2, our articles on the eye-witnesses accounts were kept secret. The constant changing of the time-zone at Gcaptain.com after our articles were published and discussed on Facebook, not only confirms the ever shifting goal posts but also the “cyber-spying”. We have to have the last laugh on this. Even technological giants and bullies fell for it.
911-II Caught Sleeping On The Job Or Part Of A Contrived Plot To Blow Up Dwh
BP's Post Blowout Blueprint Before Incident Confirms Inside Job
An Eye Witness Account Of DWH Explosion Fire 10 Miles Away
One Day Later Gcaptain Switched Time Zone To JST 9GMT, Why?
Doctored Photo Of Fishy Fishing Trip To DWH On The Night Of Explosion
Joking aside, this is only a minor score point. Their battle is to escape culpability. Like a fish caught in a net, no amount of adjustment now can free them from the net of truth. As Gcaptain.com found out, it would look utterly ridiculous for Anchorman's posting “it's 0130 in the morning now” if the time of post was 1:30 pm in the afternoon. With tails between their hind legs, Gcaptain had to admit defeat and adjust back to their normal time zone.
The court of public justice (ridicule) can be suppressed temporarily but not forever.
No crime can be so perfect as to leave no trail. There is thus, a need for mass deception in such a high profile crime. Although somebody did notice the transcripts of item A, his/her lone voice of suspicion was quickly drowned out. Why wasn't this piece of evidence investigated deeper. After 2 years, nothing was ever heard of this “explosion three hours before the rig went up in flames in a second, larger explosion”. Either there was an explosion or the transcripts were part of a contrived plot. If it was the latter, it definitely explains the “scripted screen play” so typical of Hollywood movies.
NEW ORLEANS (AP) - The Coast Guard says a crew member from an oil platform that sank off Louisiana reported an initial explosion three hours before the rig went up in flames in a second, larger explosion. Coast Guard Senior Chief Petty Officer Mike O'Berry says the first blast was reported at 7 p.m. CDT Tuesday. Later, the rig sent an emergency signal. O'Berry says a nearby rig at the same time reported the Deepwater Horizon was in flames. He says the rig didn't ask for help during the initial call. The Coast Guard sent help after the emergency signal came. The Coast Guard is investigating what happened during that three hours. A spokesman for the rig owner says any logged events are part of the investigation. AP: Oil rig reported explosion 3 hours before fire Apr 22 08:29pm EST
The scripted plot was too damn accurate to be just a fictional message written by some bored personnel working on the rig. It could not be a minor explosion incident since the scripted plot detailed out a complete rig abandonment. You do not abandon a $300 million rig for a minor fire. If it was a safety or SAR drill, you do not plan for casualties or unavoidable collateral damages. You do that for a strategic military assault to achieve certain political or economic advantage.
In peace time, we can't think of anything else except that the oil spill disaster was planned for several sinister objectives. Watch out for more articles how this can be achieved through planned disasters. Their acceptable collateral damage? Up to 15 crewmen, excluding the gulf coast victims and marine wildlife (they are part of their sinister objectives). So 4 crewmen were extremely lucky. Wonder who? They should know themselves. Their personal safety can never be assured for long.
You play with the devil, you will be sent to hell as soon as your role is over. No one ever believes the aircraft tragedies of Jim Black (BP Spill Commander) and Ted Stevens (ex Senator who had BP's files) were accidental. Just because Joe Public doesn't talk about it, doesn't mean he believes in it. Similarly, there is a wide mistrust between industry workers and their employers. That sacred trust had been broken decades ago.
Why would outsiders be brought into the crime scene as eye-witnesses when there were hundreds of workers and first responders at site? It is because they couldn't trust any of the workers to talk. The number of first responders turned problem eye-witnesses in 911 taught them a lesson. Would you tell the truth if one of your buddies perished in a planned accident?
We have studied BK's claims of being set up by his employer. To have escape so many potentially fatal “accidents” is nothing short of miracle. Amen! There are certainly merits to his cases. Isn't it too much of a coincidence for an ROV captain who had worked at the Macondo site to be killed by a great white while his buddies escaped? Even if he wasn't going to spill the beans in his Christmas home coming, there would always be uneasy feelings of knowing too much. Any surprise many had gone underground?
More than a dozen accidental deaths cannot be coincidental. Keeping quiet can be hazardous to your health. Dead men tell no tales. This a fact. Dance with the devil and you dance in hell.
By itself, Anchorman's surprisingly accurate Gcaptain posts (despite being 10 miles away from the crime scene) could be dismissed as wild guesses despite the astronomical odds. But with AP's report of an explosion 3 hours before the “accident”, coincidences can become serious evidence. Couple these two with the transcripts labeled A to D, you start to have a very credible proof of an inside job. If the fishy tale of the fishing trip to DWH on the night of explosion stands up to scrutiny, you at least have a score of 3 to 1. But with a score of 4-0, well that is something else. With BK's pieces of incriminating evidence (physics of impossibilities), the score must be an astounding 50-0. You have to admit this is truly a tilted Justice Scale by any standard. We leave it to your sense of justice whether the following fishy tale is indeed fishy (0 points to BP).
Of all the lies, the fishy tale of a fishy trip of a lifetime to DWH on the night of explosion has to be the most preposterous. You simply cannot have 200 invited guests for a funeral and yet claim the death to be purely accidental. It can't get more ridiculous than that. Yet the world is blissfully asleep because it is not their turn at the funeral pyre yet.
Greece can't be their ultimate target. 911 which was allegedly planned and executed by Al Qaeda on 11 Sept 2001 was an Inside Job. The 2003 Bam-Iran, 2004 Tsunami-USS San Francisco, 2006 Taiwan quakes were not natural disasters. They had been planned for years only to be triggered on 26 December at precisely 26 minutes after the hour.
Well the 2004 quake missed or triggered early, resulting in a badly damaged USS San Francisco nuclear submarine. Isn't this proof that the time of detonation is of critical importance as Kollmann had highlighted in his research? Why do you think the 311 Fukushima quake hit exactly on the same minute after the hour as the first plane (or drone or missile or whatever) that hit Tower 1. If you are still asleep and have not not smelled the corexit yet, then your time will come soon enough. As Dr Rikki Ott (herself a victim of the Exxon Valdez oil spill) repeatedly said, “educate yourself”. There is absolutely no way you can survive what is going to come, by burying your head in the sand.
First they came for the Communists but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists but I was not one of them, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews but I was not Jewish so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.” ~Martin Niemoeller
With the corroborating evidence of the fishy tale of 4 students who went fishing at DWH on the night of the explosion, there can be no further doubt the 20 April 2010 explosion was a contrived plot at the highest level. And the scary part? There will be more coming when the first line of resistance is gone. Quit escaping from reality by “innocently” asking why.
False evidence is a doubt edge sword.
How could Anchorman be so accurate on events that were not yet made known in the first few hours of the disaster? And yet be so wrong on details which could have been verified or repeated broadcast over the news media? If he was completely accurate on all accounts, it would have aroused suspicions. Thus, he was deliberately fed wrong information where it did not matter. In all probability Anchorman might not have known head or tail of the contrived plot.
As a respected sea captain and a vivid blogger (top contributor at Gcaptain) he was narrowed down as the best avenue to disseminate BP's half-facts. It was better he did not know the whole story except only the key details. As we have seen in Kollmann's article “Natural Accidental Disasters Timed To Happen?”, to avoid real accidents on the ground and to allow sufficient time for their agents to get to a safe distance from ground zero, the vital triggered time had to be known. Now you know why Guilliani avoided WTC-7 in the 911 disaster, 15 minutes before it collapsed completely from “unknown causes”. Anchorman's mistake was similar to BBC and Fox News announcing the collapse of WTC-7 minutes before it collapsed. How could they have known beforehand unless it was preplanned?
See BBC & FoxNews shocking Collapse News Forecasters In 911
So 126 personnel onboard (POB) became 144 or 160. Perhaps the extra 14 also included the Schlumberger crew who unexpectedly flew off on a “demand” chopper flight. What did they know to demand an instant flight out? Obviously, there was no explosion at 18:57 CDT. So how could there be transcripts of an explosion of unknown causes 3 hours before it happened? Item A clearly stated the crew had abandoned rig and “87 POB” had been picked up after the explosion event. This “planned explosion” was no small matter but a disastrous one that required all the crew to abandon rig. Is that why Anchorman posted on Gcaptain.com exactly 49 minutes after the actual blowout (which was invisible to him, 10 miles away) that “all have abandon ship”. As we tear through all these eye-witness accounts, it is obvious all of them were mere actors playing to the scripted plot.
A. 202357Z APR 10 (18:57 CDT 20 Apr 10)
INITIAL CIC BRIEF// D8 RECVD DSC FROM MOBILE DRILLING UNIT DEEPWATER HORIZON OF AN EXPLOSION ON BOARD. THERE WERE 144 POB. CAUSE OF EXPLOSION UNKNOWN. THERE IS A 285' WORKBOAT AND 2 LIFE RAFTS ON SCENE. 87 POB HAVE BEN RECVD AND ARE ON THE 285' WORKBOAT. 2 H-65'S FROM A/S NOLA, H-65, H-60 AND C-144 FROM ATC MOBILE LAUNCHED AS WELL AS CGC POMPANO AND CGC RAZORBLEL. SEVERAL GOOD SAM'S ALSO RESPONDING. THE RIG COMPANY IS TRANSOCEAN; D8 IS TRYING TO GET MORE INFORMATION FROM THEM. RIG WAS 72NM SE VENICE LA IN POS 28-44N 088-21W. // FOLLOW UP CIC WILL BE AT 0445Z.
No matter how good the actors, there will always be bloopers.
To understand the blunders highlighted here, please refer to the mudinmyblood.net/forum/showthread.php?t=6104 where the story first appeared and the CBS interview at cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6490138n&tag=related;photovideo.
Firstly, what is the chance of an impromptu fishing trip coinciding with an accidental blowout down to the exact date and hour? Noticed that the four witnesses claimed the blowout happened at around 10 pm but there was no mention of him or his buddies looking at their time. Anyone who had experienced a gas blowout within 100 yards of the derrick in a small launch at sea would have panicked, cut and run. Yet they stayed on for 4 minutes to observe the “light went out and came on again seconds before the explosion”. How did they know the rig was about to blow up in flames when the lights went off?
Another major flaw in the fishy eye-witness account has been their claim that they were that close to the rig. Unless US offshore and BP safety regulations were way below third world lax regulation and enforcement, would the captains of MV D Bankston and DWH allow any Tom, Dick or Harry fishing boat to park so near them, especially with the work vessel connected with an umbilical to receive the drilling mud from DWH. The launch could have been a terrorists' boat loaded with explosives. Didn't the control bridges of both vessels care at all or at least logged in their “displeasure” warnings?
Just like the “explosion 3 hours before”, it must have been a “phantom boat”, good enough for a fiction or Hollywood movie but failed muster inspection. And the USCG let it pass? This is no longer a conspiracy theory but a factual conspiracy. Not by the terrorists but by the highest authority in the government in cahoot with the oil company.
Look for the hidden mega windfalls in connection with the trillions of fake US treasury bonds. Fake bonds with millions or billion in denomination values, are useless except for use as collateral for short term borrowed funds. And what use would these short term borrowed funds be if not to bet against certain high odds rigged in their favor. To make big gains you have to bet on the impossible. The term “impossible” means you will lose your pants even for the first time unless you know for certain the one-to-million chance event will happen within a certain period, months ahead. So for those who kept asking “why”, please continue to bury your heads in the sand. Odds are, you will lose them in the next mega planned disaster.
Sail out 50 miles for an impromptu fishing trip without radar, navigation aids and front flood lights?
Without radar and navigation aids, could some casual fishing buddies on an impromptu boat trip have reached DWH 50 miles out in the open sea. Could a 26 footer launch have sufficient fuel for the return trip? Another giveaway was the time they left the dock; “@3pm”. Isn't that a bit precise? A 4½ hour trip to reach DWH at 07:30pm well before the planned event. What did DWH have to offer? The “expected fireworks”? Even by American brand of adventurism and rashness, it just doesn't make sense. If it was really an impromptu fishing trip why didn't they choose a closer platform at shallower water? Why head for DWH when there were tens of other nearer rigs? Platforms with legs attract more fishes than semi-subs with no legs. No active offshore platforms (drilling or production) in the world would allow unauthorized approach without prior notification, let alone allow it to latched on to its pontoon. Isn't America serious on their War on Terror?
In all likelihood, the “uninvited” fishing boat would have been chased away. If they were indeed close range eye-witnesses, they were there by invitation to observe and to record the planned fireworks. Alternatively, they might not even be at the crime site. They were merely given the video clips/photos and paid to lie. Whatever the true story was or arrangements made, this fishy tale is one more proof the blowout was an orchestrated plot with Bollywood-grade reality.
Some other discrepancies in their testimony and video itself
Uploaded by aandryiii1 on May 26, 2010 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1eLHGblEww
Ryan Chaisson, Wes Bourg, Dustin King, and myself, Albert Andry were fishing this rig right before it exploded. We were fishing the leg of it when we noticed rushing water coming down the derek, Gas began BLOWING out the side of it and we ran from the rig. It exploded seconds later. We got to a safe distance and this is what we recorded. You can see more at WWW.KNIGHTRYDERZ.COM
You can't fake background noise short of muting it and completely voice over it.
Up to minute 0.15, the video was silent (muted). When the background noise was turned on, it is too noisy to be a motor launch with its outboard engine shut off. You should be able to hear the clear sound of water flapping against the sides of the boat rather than the generator or machinery noise found in bigger, 300 footer supply vessels. The video was obviously recorded at the upper decks to get a better view. This explains the absence of water sound and higher wind noise. If the video was taken at water level (as in Anchorman's shot) there would be no “reflection trails” in the water leading to the burning rig (something to do with the angle of reflection ~BK).
The wind sound in the background was fairly strong and yet the voice of the cameramen was so clear as if it was a voice-over recording in a studio. A sound spectra analysis would be able to confirm this. With the strong wind sound and the calm but rolling water (before zooming in) the camera viewport should be more jerky on a small 26 footer. With the zoom in, it would be impossible to get a steady view of the burning rig unless the video was recorded onboard a steady platform like the deck of a supply vessel in calm water.
At minute 1:40, there was the unmistakable captain's instruction on the loud speaker to his crew at the back deck. The video had to be recorded close to the loudspeaker on a vessel bigger than Andry's 26 footer (where no loudspeaker was required).
Extra: Capturing The Disaster May 16, 2010 4:16 Pm
Albert Andry, Dustin King, Ryan Chaisson & Westley Bourg describe the explosions on the oil rig Deepwater Horizon. Chaisson began videotaping the scene almost as soon as the disaster began.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6490138n&tag=related;photovideo
“Began videotaping as soon as the disaster began” means at the time of the blowout at 21:45 CDT. They did not speed off until seconds before the explosion. A comparison of a snapshot taken from Chaisson's video recording with Anchorman's photo, suggests that “safe distance” to be between 6 to 8 miles.
The boat was stationary (from video shot) and amazingly steady for a small rocking boat which had just sped away from the exploding rig. It would have taken 30 minutes to travel 5 n.mi at 10 knots. Further a boat on water does not stop even after the engines are shut down. It glides for tens of minutes before coming to a standstill. Thus for the camera to start rolling at a stationary position (on a small boat) it would have to be at least 40 minutes. Chaisson's video would have started recording at the earliest 22:30 CDT (40 minutes after 21:50). Forty minutes after the blowout cannot be construed as “began videotaping as soon as the disaster began” in any sense of the phrase.
Forty minutes would be too long to capture the first explosion as Chaisson had claimed. If at all he was recording, we would be seeing a jerky, motion (speeding away) recording of the exploding rig. Without doubt the video was recorded from a stable stationary vessel watching the explosion from a safe distance (7-8 miles?). That vessel had to move out at least 20-30 minutes before the explosion started. No two ways about it. Alternatively if the MV D Bankston was that tiny dot next to the burning rig, then the video must have been taken on another vessel in the vicinity.
Now, the question is, how many vessels were out there within 10 miles of DWH just before the blowout? Kind of strange to have all the funeral guests arriving in black mourning suites when it was supposed to be a surprised celebration party turned funeral? Elementary, my dear Watson.
“Around 10pm the entire center of the rig started rushing water downwards over all the pipes....I looked at my friend who previously worked offshore, and he said that’s BOP something another and the rig took a ‘kick!”
If the four buddies were really within 100 yards of the blowing well, it would be inconceivable for any first timer not to mention the “torrential rain of drilling mud falling on them”. For the experienced one to have said “BOP and the rig took a kick” meant he had experienced a blowout before. So why did he not scream to speed off until 4 minutes later, just seconds before the first explosion? The experienced instant expert analysis did not jive with the 4 minutes of inaction.
I thought the rig was sinking and that was their way of bilging… But nope! Methane gas began BLOWING out of the West side of it and the noise of the thrust was louder than anything I’ve ever herd (except for a sonic boom I herd once, and what I’m about to tell you next)
“rig was sinking”...this must have been in the script from the very start because there could not be any visible sign of sinking or even any feeling of it. They were on a small boat divorced from the rig, remember.
“Methane gas”...Wait a minute, how did 4 youngsters know instantly it was Methane, a colorless and odorless gas. And in the dark? They should be hit with drilling mud, sea water and other more visible drilling fluid first. For most layman, the first exclamation would be like “it is raining MUD” not invisible gas. Again this was scripted to imply the “naturalness or expectation” of the explosion that followed. Most blowouts do not end up in flames thanks to various safety and fire hazards prevention measures. Without the dramatic effects, no one would want to see any Hollywood movies. Without the implied presence of explosive gas, there would be more piercing questions on the actual causes of the initial explosions. Oh yeah, the ever important buzz words; spark, hissing gas sound, turned off power, prevent electrical spark, generator kicked in, ignite the gas.......WOW, amazing how a 24-year old student (at that time) could have analyzed all that in his “own eye-witness” account, in his very first blowout experience?
And then this interesting response Aandryiii made to someone’s question within the follow-up thread:
When the gas started blowing out the side of the rig they turned off the power to prevent electrical spark which would ignite the gas, but when they shut power the generator kicked on and thats all she wrote!
“At approximately 100 yds from the rig it Exploded!”
They were 100 yards from the rig at 21:49 CDT when the first explosion occurred. They were under the rig a full 4 minutes before taking off after the blowout occurred. If they had taken off at the instant of the blowout (at 21:45) and at 10 knots, they would have been 0.65 nmi or 1,300 yards from the exploding DWH. Is it not surprising for an ex-offshore worker (friend) who could analyze on the spot ….a well kick and BOP, vaporizing methane hydrate etc, to stick around a full 4 minutes before screaming to take off? Yet at such a short distance they were not hit with any falling debris and drilling mud. There is no telling what damage they could have suffered at such near distance. On the other hand, would they willingly risk their lives if they were told the truth. We bet our bottom dollar, the four buddies were not under the rig at the time of the blowout or the explosion.
So why did BP need 4 outsiders to masquerade as eye-witnesses at the crime scene?
In the first place, there would have been 126 potential eye-witnesses already. Why invent more from the outside? This is again another CYA strategy. There is no telling what the “uncontrolled eye-witnesses” could tell in public, or even under controlled situation. The key to holding eye-witnesses to ransom is to hold them on their hidden crime. By lying to the public, these four youngsters were forever beholden to take their secrets to their grave (natural or prematurely). Besides, it is easier to impose a blanket ban not only on the surviving crew but all who wish to continue working in the oil industry. If they permit some and not others to talk, everyone in the industry would know who the planted moles were on the ground. Why kill their golden goose and spoil the chance for another “accidental disaster” when future opportunity presents itself again? Industry agents are difficult to come by as they are not born everyday. At the present rate, expect several blowouts (side shows) to build up to a mega strike annually. Chances are another mega spill is brewing somewhere.
Other discrepancies and contradictions
In the CBS interview (May 16, 2010 4:16 pm), the four eye-witnesses gave an account of their narrow escape. In Anchorman's photo, you can see the moon and another vessel but no trailing water surface reflections to the camera position. So either the photos were taken at vastly different location or many hours apart when the position of the moon in the sky had changed significantly. The CBS interview stated that Chaisson began videotaping the scene almost as soon as the disaster began. How could they be so near (100 yards) and more than 5 miles at the same time? Again this could only have happened on paper but not on reality.
The video cameraman mis-spoke when he said his video caught the first explosion, pointing to the hovering mushroom clouds above the rig. The CBS interviewer (at 0.27min) corrected that there was no flame in the first explosion (blowout). Andry quickly covered the mistake by describing the hissing sound of the gas in the blowout. Again there was no mention of “raining mud around them” which any eye-witness within 100 yards would have experienced. There were flames in between the float pontoon and as far as 500ft from the drill derrick side. The 4 youngsters could not have possibly escaped without burns if they were indeed at the pontoon leg of the rig. In their eye-witness accounts, never once did they mention burns although they did “confess” to feeling the intense heat when asked.
How could the boat be speeding away until a safe distance (30 minutes away) and yet still caught the mushrooming cloud from the first few explosions? By the time the small boat steady itself, the explosions would have been gone. This means the video that caught the explosions were already a few miles away at a safe distance in anticipation of the initial explosions at 21:49 CDT (not the blowout at 21:45. No video of that has surfaced yet). The video posted by Andry could not have been taken on a small 26 footer. Period!
The rig blew a few more explosions after that and began to burn down. Some of the rig began dripping into the water and the platform tilted in and turned RED HOT.
The “ platform tilted in” phrase seems to be another prepared script. The tilting happened much later. “began to burn down” and “turned RED HOT.” do not go together. If anything the burning intensified at least for the next few hours as the fuel on board started to burn.
The guy who predicted the explosion was terrified of what would happen next and would not allow for us to get any closer than a mile. He told me things about air rising from the pipes below, and how the pipes could be below us since they run at angles under water, and how the explosions would continue. I think he knew what he was talking about and made us all worry… We stayed a mile off the fire and searched/listened for missing ppl for 4 hours.
“predicted the explosion” seems such a certainty when most blowouts do not end up with an explosion or fire.
The photo comparison suggests 7-8 miles with respect to Anchorman's declared distance of 10 miles. A mile off the rig would be too close. These four guys were not survivors of a deadly blast or heroes but paid liars. Most rig survival lifeboats were designed to withstand heat up to 1000 degrees C and to escape beyond the first mile radius of a burning rig. In such unprotected close proximity from the derrick, these foursome would have been roasted alive if not blown apart. The rig survivors (crew on board) jumped into the water only after explosions. Item EG at 211313Z CGC Zepher reported finding 2 burnt life raft with no signs of life or having POB in them at position 38-45.3N 088-21.2 W or 1.5 n.miles from well A location. If the “phantom” fishing boat had been within 100 yards at the time of explosion, they would have been “dead eye-witnesses”. And they were there for 4 hours, searching and listening for missing people without a scratch in their faces? Give me a break!
- a joint effort article by the gulf truth movement. Special thanks to BK Lim, Trisha James, Peter Frizzel, Jbao, Kollmann and other contributors who preferred not to be named.
Saturday, January 28, 2012
CAFR of Social Security by Clint Richardson
Social Security Trust Fund Tops $2.6 Trillion
i
8 Votes
Well folks, it’s that time of year again.
I decided to take a look at the newer 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the Social Security Trust Funds – which is actually named:
“THE 2011 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
FEDERAL OLD-AGE AND SURVIVORS INSURANCE
AND FEDERAL DISABILITY INSURANCE TRUST FUNDS”
You may download this CAFR here:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2011/
Yes… for those of you who don’t know, the Social Security program has a massive investment trust fund that hoards your hard earned money into it every single year, and uses that money to invest in such things as war and occupation of other countries, junk bonds and federal securities – including mortgage-backed securities – and of course national and international banks and investments.
Remember, the main function of government’s taxation program is not to support government operations, but rather to increase the fund balances of governmental funds in order to create and support a massive investment based pool, which is then used for all of the non-taxpayer legal criminal activities that government participates in – what it deems as “non-governmental operations” using what it likes to consider “non-taxpayer money” derived from these investments and their returns. You see, your corporate government figures that any gains it is able to collect from investing your taxpayer money is there’s to keep and play around with at its leisure.
Of course, the Federal government continues to tell the people of America that the Social Security system is in financial ruin, and will be broke by the time many of us come-a-collectin’ in just a couple of decades. They tell us that the evil baby-boomers will strip Social Security bare, and drain the entire program into oblivion.
But I’m here to tell you that this just isn’t true. In fact, it is one of the biggest fallacies ever perpetrated upon the American public. It is a lie hidden in plain sight, just as most government programs and funds have turned out to be.
And so, according to the 2011 CAFR for the Board of Trustees of the Social Security System, the Social Security Trust Funds have a combined total of…
$2.6 trillion dollars.
W-W-What? You heard that right, my friends. Spelled out with all of those pesky zeros in place, that looks like this…
Total assets, December 31, 2010
$2,608,950,000,000
If that were to be displayed in 1 dollar bills, it would be a pile of green notes that, when stacked on top of each other, would reach all the way to the moon… and back!!!
For those of you who didn’t see the ending of “The Great Pension Fund Hoax”, we discovered that the Social Security trust funds had over $2.5 trillion dollars in the 2009 CAFR. In 2006, that figure was $1.8 trillion. That was an investment return of about $700 billion dollars in just 5 short years.
See the full film here, or skip ahead to the last half hour to see this information:
Now, as is usually the case, the government omits this knowledge from its public disclosure of the Social insurance system by simply omitting the pertinent investment portfolio and interest gains from the taxpayer budget report that is spirited out to the public. And it does not mention the word CAFR in any session of government or in any public forum. You will not hear about this report on the nightly news. In short, by hiding this information from taxpayer disclosure, the government is lying by omission. And this sort of malfeasance is taking place in every facet of local, county, state, and federal government.
Now, let’s take a look at what Timothy Geithner and the other Trustees of the Social Security Trust Funds have to say to the public about the state of these funds…
Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs
A SUMMARY OF THE 2011 ANNUAL REPORTS
Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A MESSAGE TO THE PUBLIC:
Each year the Trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust
funds report on the current and projected financial status of the
two programs. This message summarizes our 2011 Annual Reports.
Social Security
Social Security expenditures exceeded the program’s non-interest
income in 2010 for the first time since 1983. The $49 billion
deficit last year (excluding interest income) and $46
billion projected deficit in 2011 are in large part due to the
weakened economy and to downward income adjustments that
correct for excess payroll tax revenue credited to the trust funds
in earlier years. This deficit is expected to shrink to about $20
billion for years 2012-2014 as the economy strengthens.
After 2014, cash deficits are expected to grow rapidly as the
number of beneficiaries continues to grow at a substantially
faster rate than the number of covered workers. Through 2022,
the annual cash deficits will be made up by redeeming trust fund
assets from the General Fund of the Treasury. Because these
redemptions will be less than interest earnings, trust fund
balances will continue to grow. After 2022, trust fund assets will
be redeemed in amounts that exceed interest earnings until trust
fund reserves are exhausted in 2036, one year earlier than was
projected last year. Thereafter, tax income would be sufficient to
pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2085.
Source: http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TRSUM/index.html
Well now, wait a darn minute here! Didn’t the CAFR just state that the Social Security system had a $90 billion dollar increase in capital gains? How then can this budget report state with a straight face that the fund suffered a $46 billion dollar loss?
Ah… this is government’s creative accounting.
But let’s go one step further.
Back to the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, where it shows on page 36:
Actuarial Estimates
Table IV.A1. – Operations of the OASI Trust Fund, Calendar Years 2006-2020
1) Best case scenario – The fund will increase to
$4.054 trillion dollars by 2020, which equals an investment gain of about $1.4 trillion dollars in just 8 years.
2) Intermediate scenario – The Fund will increase to
$3.671 trillion dollars by 2020, which equals an investment gain of about $1 trillion dollars in just 8 years.
3) Worse case scenario – The fund will increase to
$3.278 trillion dollars by 2020, which equals an investment gain of about $600 billion dollars in just 8 years.
So here the Board of Trustees is telling us in the CAFR (audit) of these funds that they will no doubt increase by at least many hundreds of billions of dollars, while at the same time publicly announcing that the Social Security system is showing a current and a future projected deficit of $46 billion dollars for 2011 fiscal year.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the perfect embodiment of how your many governments, be it local, state, or federal, are literally fooling you by the simple act of omission of the pertinent information held within the government audit (the CAFR report) and spoon-feeding the American public a heaping dose of fear-based half-truths sprinkled with a splash of treason, and finished off with a good laugh all the way to the banks (which government owns as majority stock holder of those banks).
And we the people keep feeding the monkeys instead of starving them!
Oh, I’m sorry…
Did I interrupt re-runs of “Dancing With The Stars”?
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, January 27th, 2012
i
8 Votes
Well folks, it’s that time of year again.
I decided to take a look at the newer 2011 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the Social Security Trust Funds – which is actually named:
“THE 2011 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
FEDERAL OLD-AGE AND SURVIVORS INSURANCE
AND FEDERAL DISABILITY INSURANCE TRUST FUNDS”
You may download this CAFR here:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2011/
Yes… for those of you who don’t know, the Social Security program has a massive investment trust fund that hoards your hard earned money into it every single year, and uses that money to invest in such things as war and occupation of other countries, junk bonds and federal securities – including mortgage-backed securities – and of course national and international banks and investments.
Remember, the main function of government’s taxation program is not to support government operations, but rather to increase the fund balances of governmental funds in order to create and support a massive investment based pool, which is then used for all of the non-taxpayer legal criminal activities that government participates in – what it deems as “non-governmental operations” using what it likes to consider “non-taxpayer money” derived from these investments and their returns. You see, your corporate government figures that any gains it is able to collect from investing your taxpayer money is there’s to keep and play around with at its leisure.
Of course, the Federal government continues to tell the people of America that the Social Security system is in financial ruin, and will be broke by the time many of us come-a-collectin’ in just a couple of decades. They tell us that the evil baby-boomers will strip Social Security bare, and drain the entire program into oblivion.
But I’m here to tell you that this just isn’t true. In fact, it is one of the biggest fallacies ever perpetrated upon the American public. It is a lie hidden in plain sight, just as most government programs and funds have turned out to be.
And so, according to the 2011 CAFR for the Board of Trustees of the Social Security System, the Social Security Trust Funds have a combined total of…
$2.6 trillion dollars.
W-W-What? You heard that right, my friends. Spelled out with all of those pesky zeros in place, that looks like this…
Total assets, December 31, 2010
$2,608,950,000,000
If that were to be displayed in 1 dollar bills, it would be a pile of green notes that, when stacked on top of each other, would reach all the way to the moon… and back!!!
For those of you who didn’t see the ending of “The Great Pension Fund Hoax”, we discovered that the Social Security trust funds had over $2.5 trillion dollars in the 2009 CAFR. In 2006, that figure was $1.8 trillion. That was an investment return of about $700 billion dollars in just 5 short years.
See the full film here, or skip ahead to the last half hour to see this information:
Now, as is usually the case, the government omits this knowledge from its public disclosure of the Social insurance system by simply omitting the pertinent investment portfolio and interest gains from the taxpayer budget report that is spirited out to the public. And it does not mention the word CAFR in any session of government or in any public forum. You will not hear about this report on the nightly news. In short, by hiding this information from taxpayer disclosure, the government is lying by omission. And this sort of malfeasance is taking place in every facet of local, county, state, and federal government.
Now, let’s take a look at what Timothy Geithner and the other Trustees of the Social Security Trust Funds have to say to the public about the state of these funds…
Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs
A SUMMARY OF THE 2011 ANNUAL REPORTS
Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A MESSAGE TO THE PUBLIC:
Each year the Trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust
funds report on the current and projected financial status of the
two programs. This message summarizes our 2011 Annual Reports.
Social Security
Social Security expenditures exceeded the program’s non-interest
income in 2010 for the first time since 1983. The $49 billion
deficit last year (excluding interest income) and $46
billion projected deficit in 2011 are in large part due to the
weakened economy and to downward income adjustments that
correct for excess payroll tax revenue credited to the trust funds
in earlier years. This deficit is expected to shrink to about $20
billion for years 2012-2014 as the economy strengthens.
After 2014, cash deficits are expected to grow rapidly as the
number of beneficiaries continues to grow at a substantially
faster rate than the number of covered workers. Through 2022,
the annual cash deficits will be made up by redeeming trust fund
assets from the General Fund of the Treasury. Because these
redemptions will be less than interest earnings, trust fund
balances will continue to grow. After 2022, trust fund assets will
be redeemed in amounts that exceed interest earnings until trust
fund reserves are exhausted in 2036, one year earlier than was
projected last year. Thereafter, tax income would be sufficient to
pay only about three-quarters of scheduled benefits through 2085.
Source: http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TRSUM/index.html
Well now, wait a darn minute here! Didn’t the CAFR just state that the Social Security system had a $90 billion dollar increase in capital gains? How then can this budget report state with a straight face that the fund suffered a $46 billion dollar loss?
Ah… this is government’s creative accounting.
But let’s go one step further.
Back to the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, where it shows on page 36:
Actuarial Estimates
Table IV.A1. – Operations of the OASI Trust Fund, Calendar Years 2006-2020
1) Best case scenario – The fund will increase to
$4.054 trillion dollars by 2020, which equals an investment gain of about $1.4 trillion dollars in just 8 years.
2) Intermediate scenario – The Fund will increase to
$3.671 trillion dollars by 2020, which equals an investment gain of about $1 trillion dollars in just 8 years.
3) Worse case scenario – The fund will increase to
$3.278 trillion dollars by 2020, which equals an investment gain of about $600 billion dollars in just 8 years.
So here the Board of Trustees is telling us in the CAFR (audit) of these funds that they will no doubt increase by at least many hundreds of billions of dollars, while at the same time publicly announcing that the Social Security system is showing a current and a future projected deficit of $46 billion dollars for 2011 fiscal year.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the perfect embodiment of how your many governments, be it local, state, or federal, are literally fooling you by the simple act of omission of the pertinent information held within the government audit (the CAFR report) and spoon-feeding the American public a heaping dose of fear-based half-truths sprinkled with a splash of treason, and finished off with a good laugh all the way to the banks (which government owns as majority stock holder of those banks).
And we the people keep feeding the monkeys instead of starving them!
Oh, I’m sorry…
Did I interrupt re-runs of “Dancing With The Stars”?
.
–Clint Richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com)
–Friday, January 27th, 2012
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
34 Facts about Debt
34 Shocking Facts About U.S. Debt That Should Set America On Fire With Anger
We have all been lied to. For decades, the leaders of both major political parties have promised us that they can fix our current system and that they can get our national debt under control. As the 2012 election approaches, they are making all kinds of wild promises once again. Well you know what? It is all a giant sham. The United States has gotten into so much debt that there will be no coming back from this. The current system is irretrievably broken. 30 years ago the U.S. debt was a horrific crisis that was completely and totally out of control. If we would have dealt with it back then maybe we could have done something about it. But now it is 15 times larger, and we are adding more than a trillion dollars to the debt every single year. The facts that you are about to read below should set America on fire with anger. Please share them with as many people as you can. What we are doing to our children and our grandchildren is absolutely nightmarish. Words like "abuse", "financial rape", "theft" and "crime" do not even begin to describe what we are doing to future generations. We were the wealthiest nation on earth, but it wasn't good enough just to squander all of our own money. We had to squander the money of our children and our grandchildren as well. America has been so selfish and so self-centered that it is hard to argue that we don't deserve what is about to happen to this country. We have stolen the future of America, and yet we strut around as if we are the smartest generation that ever walked the face of the earth.
All of this prosperity that we see all around us is just an illusion. It is a false prosperity that has been purchased by the biggest mountain of debt in the history of the world.
Did you know that if you added up all forms of debt in the United States and divided it up equally that every single family in the country would owe more than $683,000?
We are a nation that is absolutely addicted to debt, and the U.S. debt crisis threatens to destroy everything that our forefathers built.
Yes, everything may seem fine for the moment, but what do you think would happen if the federal government suddenly adopted a balanced budget?
1.3 trillion dollars a year would be sucked right out of the economy and we would be looking at an "economic readjustment" that would be mind blowing.
Enjoy this false prosperity while you can, because it is not going to last.
Debt is a very cruel master, and our day of reckoning is almost here.
The following are 34 shocking facts about U.S. debt that should set America on fire with anger....
#1 During fiscal year 2011, the U.S. government spent 3.7 trillion dollars but it only brought in 2.4 trillion dollars.
#2 When Ronald Reagan took office, the U.S. national debt was less than 1 trillion dollars. Today, the U.S. national debt is over 15.2 trillion dollars.
#3 During 2011, U.S. debt surpassed 100 percent of GDP for the first time ever.
#4 According to Wikipedia, the monetary base "consists of coins, paper money (both as bank vault cash and as currency circulating in the public), and commercial banks' reserves with the central bank." Currently the U.S. monetary base is sitting somewhere around 2.7 trillion dollars. So if you went out and gathered all of that money up it would only make a small dent in our national debt. But afterwards there would be no currency for anyone to use.
#5 The U.S. government spent over 454 billion dollars just on interest on the national debt during fiscal 2011.
#6 The U.S. government has total assets of 2.7 trillion dollars and has total liabilities of 17.5 trillion dollars. The liabilities do not even count 4.7 trillion dollars of intragovernmental debt that is currently outstanding.
#7 During the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.
#8 It is being projected that the U.S. national debt will surpass 23 trillion dollars in 2015.
#9 According to the GAO, the U.S. government is facing 34 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities for social insurance programs such as Social Security and Medicare. These are obligations that we have already committed ourselves to but that we do not have any money for.
#10 Others estimate that the unfunded liabilities of the U.S. government now total over 117 trillion dollars.
#11 According to the GAO, the ratio of debt held by the public to GDP is projected to reach 287 percent of GDP by 2086.
#12 Others are much less optimistic. A recently revised IMF policy paper entitled “An Analysis of U.S. Fiscal and Generational Imbalances: Who Will Pay and How?” projects that U.S. government debt will rise to about 400 percent of GDP by the year 2050.
#13 The United States government is responsible for more than a third of all the government debt in the entire world.
#14 If you divide up the national debt equally among all U.S. taxpayers, each taxpayer would owe approximately $134,685.
#15 Mandatory federal spending surpassed total federal revenue for the first time ever in fiscal 2011. That was not supposed to happen until 50 years from now.
#16 Between 2007 and 2010, U.S. GDP grew by only 4.26%, but the U.S. national debt soared by 61% during that same time period.
#17 During Barack Obama's first two years in office, the U.S. government added more to the U.S. national debt than the first 100 U.S. Congresses combined.
#18 When you add up all spending by the federal government, state governments and local governments, it comes to 46.6% of GDP.
#19 Our nation is more addicted to government checks than ever before. In 1980, government transfer payments accounted for just 11.7% of all income. Today, government transfer payments account for 18.4% of all income.
#20 U.S. households are now actually receiving more money directly from the U.S. government than they are paying to the government in taxes.
#21 A staggering 48.5% of all Americans live in a household that receives some form of government benefits. Back in 1983, that number was below 30 percent.
#22 Back in 1965, only one out of every 50 Americans was on Medicaid. Today, one out of every 6 Americans is on Medicaid.
#23 In 1950, each retiree's Social Security benefit was paid for by 16 U.S. workers. According to new data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are now only 1.75 full-time private sector workers for each person that is receiving Social Security benefits in the United States.
#24 The U.S. government now says that the Medicare trust fund will run out five years faster than they were projecting just last year.
#25 Right now, spending by the federal government accounts for about 24 percent of GDP. Back in 2001, it accounted for just 18 percent.
#26 If the U.S. government was forced to use GAAP accounting principles (like all publicly-traded corporations must), the U.S. government budget deficit would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 trillion to $5 trillion each and every year.
#27 If you were alive when Christ was born and you spent one million dollars every single day since that point, you still would not have spent one trillion dollars by now. But this year alone the U.S. government is going to add more than a trillion dollars to the national debt.
#28 If right this moment you went out and started spending one dollar every single second, it would take you more than 31,000 years to spend one trillion dollars.
#29 A trillion $10 bills, if they were taped end to end, would wrap around the globe more than 380 times. That amount of money would still not be enough to pay off the U.S. national debt.
#30 If the federal government began right at this moment to repay the U.S. national debt at a rate of one dollar per second, it would take over 470,000 years to pay off the national debt.
#31 If Bill Gates gave every penny of his fortune to the U.S. government, it would only cover the U.S. budget deficit for 15 days.
#32 According to Professor Laurence J. Kotlikoff, the U.S. is facing a "fiscal gap" of over 200 trillion dollars in the future. The following is a brief excerpt from a recent article that he did for CNN....
The government's total indebtedness -- its fiscal gap -- now stands at $211 trillion, by my arithmetic. The fiscal gap is the difference, measured in present value, between all projected future spending obligations -- including our huge defense expenditures and massive entitlement programs, as well as making interest and principal payments on the official debt -- and all projected future taxes.
#33 If you add up all forms of debt in the United States (government, business and consumer), it comes to more than 56 trillion dollars. That is more than $683,000 per family. Unfortunately, the average amount of savings per family in the U.S. is only about $4,735.
#34 The U.S. national debt is now more than 5000 times larger than it was when the Federal Reserve was created back in 1913.
But do our leaders care about statistics such as these?
No.
In fact, Barack Obama says that we need to raise the debt limit by another 1.2 trillion dollars.
The absurdity of raising the debt limit when we are already in so much debt is beautifully illustrated by the video posted below....
I just thought that video was so well done.
The "huge cuts" that Congress has agreed to are absolutely meaningless when compared to how rapidly our debt is exploding.
Calling those cuts "pocket change" would be an insult to pocket change.
But it is not just U.S. debt that is the problem. The European debt crisis threatens to completely unravel in 2012 and Japan actually has the highest debt to GDP ratio in the entire industrialized world.
In 2012, a total of 7,600,000,000,000 dollars of debt must be rolled over by the G-7 nations, Brazil, Russia, India and China.
That doesn't even count new borrowing. That number just represents old debts that are coming due that must be refinanced.
Anyone out there that insists that this debt bubble can be fixed under our current system is lying.
A massive amount of financial pain is coming.
It is time for Americans to wake up from their television-induced comas.
It is time for Americans to get very angry.
Your future has been destroyed and the future of your children and grandchildren has been destroyed.
You better take action while you still can.
We have all been lied to. For decades, the leaders of both major political parties have promised us that they can fix our current system and that they can get our national debt under control. As the 2012 election approaches, they are making all kinds of wild promises once again. Well you know what? It is all a giant sham. The United States has gotten into so much debt that there will be no coming back from this. The current system is irretrievably broken. 30 years ago the U.S. debt was a horrific crisis that was completely and totally out of control. If we would have dealt with it back then maybe we could have done something about it. But now it is 15 times larger, and we are adding more than a trillion dollars to the debt every single year. The facts that you are about to read below should set America on fire with anger. Please share them with as many people as you can. What we are doing to our children and our grandchildren is absolutely nightmarish. Words like "abuse", "financial rape", "theft" and "crime" do not even begin to describe what we are doing to future generations. We were the wealthiest nation on earth, but it wasn't good enough just to squander all of our own money. We had to squander the money of our children and our grandchildren as well. America has been so selfish and so self-centered that it is hard to argue that we don't deserve what is about to happen to this country. We have stolen the future of America, and yet we strut around as if we are the smartest generation that ever walked the face of the earth.
All of this prosperity that we see all around us is just an illusion. It is a false prosperity that has been purchased by the biggest mountain of debt in the history of the world.
Did you know that if you added up all forms of debt in the United States and divided it up equally that every single family in the country would owe more than $683,000?
We are a nation that is absolutely addicted to debt, and the U.S. debt crisis threatens to destroy everything that our forefathers built.
Yes, everything may seem fine for the moment, but what do you think would happen if the federal government suddenly adopted a balanced budget?
1.3 trillion dollars a year would be sucked right out of the economy and we would be looking at an "economic readjustment" that would be mind blowing.
Enjoy this false prosperity while you can, because it is not going to last.
Debt is a very cruel master, and our day of reckoning is almost here.
The following are 34 shocking facts about U.S. debt that should set America on fire with anger....
#1 During fiscal year 2011, the U.S. government spent 3.7 trillion dollars but it only brought in 2.4 trillion dollars.
#2 When Ronald Reagan took office, the U.S. national debt was less than 1 trillion dollars. Today, the U.S. national debt is over 15.2 trillion dollars.
#3 During 2011, U.S. debt surpassed 100 percent of GDP for the first time ever.
#4 According to Wikipedia, the monetary base "consists of coins, paper money (both as bank vault cash and as currency circulating in the public), and commercial banks' reserves with the central bank." Currently the U.S. monetary base is sitting somewhere around 2.7 trillion dollars. So if you went out and gathered all of that money up it would only make a small dent in our national debt. But afterwards there would be no currency for anyone to use.
#5 The U.S. government spent over 454 billion dollars just on interest on the national debt during fiscal 2011.
#6 The U.S. government has total assets of 2.7 trillion dollars and has total liabilities of 17.5 trillion dollars. The liabilities do not even count 4.7 trillion dollars of intragovernmental debt that is currently outstanding.
#7 During the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.
#8 It is being projected that the U.S. national debt will surpass 23 trillion dollars in 2015.
#9 According to the GAO, the U.S. government is facing 34 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities for social insurance programs such as Social Security and Medicare. These are obligations that we have already committed ourselves to but that we do not have any money for.
#10 Others estimate that the unfunded liabilities of the U.S. government now total over 117 trillion dollars.
#11 According to the GAO, the ratio of debt held by the public to GDP is projected to reach 287 percent of GDP by 2086.
#12 Others are much less optimistic. A recently revised IMF policy paper entitled “An Analysis of U.S. Fiscal and Generational Imbalances: Who Will Pay and How?” projects that U.S. government debt will rise to about 400 percent of GDP by the year 2050.
#13 The United States government is responsible for more than a third of all the government debt in the entire world.
#14 If you divide up the national debt equally among all U.S. taxpayers, each taxpayer would owe approximately $134,685.
#15 Mandatory federal spending surpassed total federal revenue for the first time ever in fiscal 2011. That was not supposed to happen until 50 years from now.
#16 Between 2007 and 2010, U.S. GDP grew by only 4.26%, but the U.S. national debt soared by 61% during that same time period.
#17 During Barack Obama's first two years in office, the U.S. government added more to the U.S. national debt than the first 100 U.S. Congresses combined.
#18 When you add up all spending by the federal government, state governments and local governments, it comes to 46.6% of GDP.
#19 Our nation is more addicted to government checks than ever before. In 1980, government transfer payments accounted for just 11.7% of all income. Today, government transfer payments account for 18.4% of all income.
#20 U.S. households are now actually receiving more money directly from the U.S. government than they are paying to the government in taxes.
#21 A staggering 48.5% of all Americans live in a household that receives some form of government benefits. Back in 1983, that number was below 30 percent.
#22 Back in 1965, only one out of every 50 Americans was on Medicaid. Today, one out of every 6 Americans is on Medicaid.
#23 In 1950, each retiree's Social Security benefit was paid for by 16 U.S. workers. According to new data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are now only 1.75 full-time private sector workers for each person that is receiving Social Security benefits in the United States.
#24 The U.S. government now says that the Medicare trust fund will run out five years faster than they were projecting just last year.
#25 Right now, spending by the federal government accounts for about 24 percent of GDP. Back in 2001, it accounted for just 18 percent.
#26 If the U.S. government was forced to use GAAP accounting principles (like all publicly-traded corporations must), the U.S. government budget deficit would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 trillion to $5 trillion each and every year.
#27 If you were alive when Christ was born and you spent one million dollars every single day since that point, you still would not have spent one trillion dollars by now. But this year alone the U.S. government is going to add more than a trillion dollars to the national debt.
#28 If right this moment you went out and started spending one dollar every single second, it would take you more than 31,000 years to spend one trillion dollars.
#29 A trillion $10 bills, if they were taped end to end, would wrap around the globe more than 380 times. That amount of money would still not be enough to pay off the U.S. national debt.
#30 If the federal government began right at this moment to repay the U.S. national debt at a rate of one dollar per second, it would take over 470,000 years to pay off the national debt.
#31 If Bill Gates gave every penny of his fortune to the U.S. government, it would only cover the U.S. budget deficit for 15 days.
#32 According to Professor Laurence J. Kotlikoff, the U.S. is facing a "fiscal gap" of over 200 trillion dollars in the future. The following is a brief excerpt from a recent article that he did for CNN....
The government's total indebtedness -- its fiscal gap -- now stands at $211 trillion, by my arithmetic. The fiscal gap is the difference, measured in present value, between all projected future spending obligations -- including our huge defense expenditures and massive entitlement programs, as well as making interest and principal payments on the official debt -- and all projected future taxes.
#33 If you add up all forms of debt in the United States (government, business and consumer), it comes to more than 56 trillion dollars. That is more than $683,000 per family. Unfortunately, the average amount of savings per family in the U.S. is only about $4,735.
#34 The U.S. national debt is now more than 5000 times larger than it was when the Federal Reserve was created back in 1913.
But do our leaders care about statistics such as these?
No.
In fact, Barack Obama says that we need to raise the debt limit by another 1.2 trillion dollars.
The absurdity of raising the debt limit when we are already in so much debt is beautifully illustrated by the video posted below....
I just thought that video was so well done.
The "huge cuts" that Congress has agreed to are absolutely meaningless when compared to how rapidly our debt is exploding.
Calling those cuts "pocket change" would be an insult to pocket change.
But it is not just U.S. debt that is the problem. The European debt crisis threatens to completely unravel in 2012 and Japan actually has the highest debt to GDP ratio in the entire industrialized world.
In 2012, a total of 7,600,000,000,000 dollars of debt must be rolled over by the G-7 nations, Brazil, Russia, India and China.
That doesn't even count new borrowing. That number just represents old debts that are coming due that must be refinanced.
Anyone out there that insists that this debt bubble can be fixed under our current system is lying.
A massive amount of financial pain is coming.
It is time for Americans to wake up from their television-induced comas.
It is time for Americans to get very angry.
Your future has been destroyed and the future of your children and grandchildren has been destroyed.
You better take action while you still can.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Its REALLY IN OUR HANDS!!
Here is a refresher look at a large government fund ("1" fund)
The Pie Chart shown is an interactive listing of the different categories of the investments held. What is shown is noted in "thousands" so add three zeros at the end of each number.
http://CAFR1.com/CALSTRS.html
What will amaze you is when you go down the listings of "domestic" and "global" investments listed both in equities; mortgages; bonds; and real-estate ventures.
Keep in mind this is just "one" government fund (a large one) out of tens of thousands of local and federal investment funds large and small.
With that in mind, then think of the collective ownership from all local and federal investment accounts. The private sectors ownership in comparison is insignificant at this point.
Clint Richardson from Utah took the time in one of his recent videos entitled: The Great Pension Fund Hoax (very long), to systematical go through a grouping of one large fund after another just targeting two companies to determine the "collective" ownership by just the showing of those few large funds looked at. One of the two was Apple Inc. From the showing of just a few large government funds the 50% ownership mark was breached rather quickly.
It really does not take to much cognitive thinking to then think of the collective many "other" government funds to establish almost absolute ownership of the same.
The population is constantly soundbite distracted never to look at the basics of collective ownership by government and additionally government has many symbiotic relationships with the media and education who are in full cooperation to never mention the same due to the money and control that those collective government investment ownership wield.
The biggest "fill in the blank" confirmation that is learned when the population looks and then comprehends government collective ownership "globally" is that the United States of America's political structure and thus United States Government (local and federal) has developed into a well organized corporate communist entity with a rather hostile fascist twist exercised and maintained through the courts and local / federal government statutory creation and control.
TREASON: "Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612
Separation of fictional TV entertainment combined with masterful selective presentation by the syndicated news media / organized education, or hard cold reality of the "facts"that have always been there but an intentional void was created due to the money and control involved is the choice every one needs to choose between to determine the inevitable outcome of their lives. In end result the choice boils down to "Masterfully entertained" or becoming an educated "Effective activist".
The World is ours but only if we make it so. And always remember: "If you are effective it is your own damn fault"
Sent FYI and truly yours,
Walter Burien - CAFR1.com
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936
Tel. (928) 458-5854
The Pie Chart shown is an interactive listing of the different categories of the investments held. What is shown is noted in "thousands" so add three zeros at the end of each number.
http://CAFR1.com/CALSTRS.html
What will amaze you is when you go down the listings of "domestic" and "global" investments listed both in equities; mortgages; bonds; and real-estate ventures.
Keep in mind this is just "one" government fund (a large one) out of tens of thousands of local and federal investment funds large and small.
With that in mind, then think of the collective ownership from all local and federal investment accounts. The private sectors ownership in comparison is insignificant at this point.
Clint Richardson from Utah took the time in one of his recent videos entitled: The Great Pension Fund Hoax (very long), to systematical go through a grouping of one large fund after another just targeting two companies to determine the "collective" ownership by just the showing of those few large funds looked at. One of the two was Apple Inc. From the showing of just a few large government funds the 50% ownership mark was breached rather quickly.
It really does not take to much cognitive thinking to then think of the collective many "other" government funds to establish almost absolute ownership of the same.
The population is constantly soundbite distracted never to look at the basics of collective ownership by government and additionally government has many symbiotic relationships with the media and education who are in full cooperation to never mention the same due to the money and control that those collective government investment ownership wield.
The biggest "fill in the blank" confirmation that is learned when the population looks and then comprehends government collective ownership "globally" is that the United States of America's political structure and thus United States Government (local and federal) has developed into a well organized corporate communist entity with a rather hostile fascist twist exercised and maintained through the courts and local / federal government statutory creation and control.
TREASON: "Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612
Separation of fictional TV entertainment combined with masterful selective presentation by the syndicated news media / organized education, or hard cold reality of the "facts"that have always been there but an intentional void was created due to the money and control involved is the choice every one needs to choose between to determine the inevitable outcome of their lives. In end result the choice boils down to "Masterfully entertained" or becoming an educated "Effective activist".
The World is ours but only if we make it so. And always remember: "If you are effective it is your own damn fault"
Sent FYI and truly yours,
Walter Burien - CAFR1.com
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936
Tel. (928) 458-5854
Sunday, December 4, 2011
The Truth about ATTORNEYS Part 2
12/03/11
Government for the last ten-thousand years has always been: "Where the money is" and recently more money generated and held by each and every local and federal government operation than Midas ever dreamed about .
The population over the last ten-thousand years has suffered great threat and damage to their lives from the abuses that greed and opportunity produces through easy access from the inside walls of government from that wealth amassed and what its use can produce for a select group of inside players when no checks and balances are in place to avert such abuses.
Our fore-fathers created several barriers for government to keep the abuses in check. They wanted a centralized government but they also wanted a limited government. A centralized government that could network in time of war to protect the country and also network to maintain a strong economy where the population prospered.
The "States" and other local governments where allowed under the original organization structure to maintain their own houses under set general guidelines that applied to one and all. The three "Houses" of government were established to segregate power into three unique entities that could keep checks and balances in play to stop abuses of one branch by the corrective actions implemented from the other. The fore-fathers knew all to well that the old adage of: "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely was very true and was true to the severe detriment of the population.
One reality that has developed over the last several decades that circumvented our fore-fathers intent of limited government through the application of three branches of government was the merger of all three to be effectively networked as one.
This was done not by openly dissolving two but by takeover through common operating personnel of a selective "Clan" of controlling members now networked together to make the three houses one. That Clan is Attorneys / Lawyers. Seventy-percent on average of the elected officials (governors; Congress; Senate; Mayors; County Commissions) are now attorneys who effectively belong to the same club, having the same standardized mode of operation.
Most attorneys are not know for their benevolence and in the alternative stridently pursue liberating opponents of wealth to be utilized at "their" disposal. By nature this Clan sees the population as the opponent to be liberated of their wealth; controlled; and destroyed through the use of imposed edicts in the event they object.
Under this environment the population is at grave risk and will remain in grave risk as long as the prevalence of this circumstance prevails. That old expression of: "Well, you voted for the guy so you deserve what you get." is true on the surface but keep in mind this Clan intentionally does not promote the fact that they are attorneys.
In my guess ninety-percent of the people that vote do not even realize the person they are voting for is an attorney to their own disadvantage. The other ten-percent just don't even comprehend what the final effect is of establishing this type of Clan into power. A little collective consciousness on the part of the population in this regard is direly needed for corrective application.
The aspect of wealth maintained by government, our fore-fathers knew that if collective government had the ability to acquire all of the wealth of the country and its productivity value that they would do so if unrestrained. The checks and balances used here were along the lines of preventing monopolies from forming within the thousands of local governments that allowed them to act as one to become collective take-over giants by coordinated investing, targeting industry; finance; and service private corporations.
Local governments from the get-go had strict and standardized guidelines as to the scope and size of what they could acquire. Investment funds held by local governments were limited to not have more than 5% ownership by investment in any one company. They were required to invest 95% of their capital in the USA and restricted to 5% outside of the USA. Cash accounts were required to be diversified between several different locations. The ability to forcibly take land and possessions from the population were limited from the inception guidelines of the fore-fathers to be virtually nil except in the time of "domestic" invasion by war.
But, as has always been the case: When you have great wealth the potential for great theft is ever all so present.
In my short life of fifty-six years, what I have seen utilized prevalently to facilitate the massive theft that now permeates all of our lives boils down to three primary factors:
1. The population is kept masterfully entertained with good; bad; and dire consequential entertainment, cleverly orchestrated to keep the common population's thinking and mindset off in La-La land of distraction so that the reality of massive and also not so massive thefts play out unabated to conclusion for the converting of the wealth being stolen.
The syndicated media and controlled education were targeted rather effectively to that end and cooperate ruthlessly quite simply due to the money involved and how much of that money is easily made available to them.
Over the last decade I have had thousands of people make comment per the syndicated media of: "Why don't they do their jobs and report on this?" My reply is now always the same: "They do an excellent job, they do EXACTLY what they are paid to do."
If that news anchor steps out of line and makes simple mention of something that triggers a cognitive though in the viewers that is contrary to the controllers agenda, they are simply replaced with a young suck-up that will follow instructions. Ever wonder why the roll-over is so quick in news anchors now a day when in the past the anchors lasted for decades?
2. For local governments that have collective wealth, investment assets, and enterprise operations valued in the trillions of dollars held, the way they by-passed the monopoly limits per take-over of it all both domestic and internationally from the private sector for ultimate control and profit was by covertly creating "private" associations that were NGOs (Non Government Organizations) who by nature and intent kept very low profiles.
In doing so this gave the ability to network thousands of local governments acting now as one through the NGO associations to in effect circumvent the "individual" restrictions in place for those local governments. Keep in mind that both the "Democratic" and "Republican" parties are both NGO "Private Associations" created from the get-go to get their players in to have access and control over the massive til of wealth held under government trust. In conjuncture with human nature; greed; and opportunity, what was said or implied to the population by that local party or party representative had strictly the value of being: Giving them the ability to get their foot in and through the door. The intent on the other hand was to control the til and thus determine the policies set for its looting and use. The population has always been the second thought consideration.
3. I have noticed one prevalent tactic used of: Give the exact opposite impression of reality to accomplish the objective of looting and maintaining the wealth transfer. The easiest way to steal money from someone is if the mark never knew they had the money in the first place. Within the most corrupt local governments in current times crying poverty; need to reduce services (more for them); and then at the same time increase expenditures.
From 2008 to 2011 most crying poverty increased expenditures by 30% to say and justify they were short of funds and need to raise taxes. What is humorous when they cry shortfall and poverty is the FACT again: That they have more amassed wealth and annual income than Midas ever dreamed about. Kinda like Bill gates starting off with a million and increasing it to a hundred-billion over twenty-years, then taking a ten-billion dollar setback one year to ninety-billion, and crying poverty with the need to declare bankruptcy.
The biggest misrepresentation the general population falls prey to is the representations to the population that the government needs to give away money (trillions of dollars) to help the population. On the surface this may be true being that those trillions being spent by those who get it will help the majority of the population and help keep the economy rolling along from that money being spent.
BUT, the true underling intent is: Government collectively over the decades bought up most of the key energy; financial; and service "private sector" operations by investment. By releasing trillions of dollars from the til and tagging taxpayers to pay the bill over the next few decades, those trillions spent go directly into the profit margins of the "private sector" industrial; financial; and service corporations that government now collectively owns by investment with government now being the primary beneficiary as the principle stock holder and equity investor.
Government thus guarantees themselves being the "First Line Beneficiary" from the massive wealth transfer in end result. This keeps their bottom line, from their collective global investments being the largest owner collectively in the black... Get it? I hope so.. The Healthcare Bill; NAFTA; GATT; ect., were and are all designed to accomplish this specific end.
I am not going to go into here how they make trillions through the use of "short" derivatives by collapsing world markets, or make trillions as all think a collapse is imminent and the markets roll back up, but they do so, and do so very efficiently and well. Always keep in mind your entertainment good and bad with the soundbite conditioning you are spoon fed is designed for wealth transfer.. Your wealth into someone else's pocket.
I brought forward the application of the TRF that is designed to make the population the "First Line Beneficiary" through the phasing out of all taxation (property; personal; corporate; and sales) as the investment wealth growing in the TRF accounts drives the economy; government; financial cartels; and all within the population in a very prosperous fashion for the next thousand years, and I must say after a ten-year effort and tens of millions being reached with the idea, it is finally catching on.
I am expecting the first two counties to come online with the TRF in 2012. Thousands of other venues will follow in the short run by example. From start to finish in transitioning 80% of local government structures into the TRF mode of operation structure, I would expect the transition to take five to seven years to accomplish that end. Federal is a whole other story and will be a harder nut to crack per modifying their method of operation to meet general purpose operating funds. when the time comes, we will see what can be done there also.
3. The population being "trained" not to look and thus not comprehend. A complete vacuum and void was created in the populations cognitive thinking as to the "basics" of government wealth being amassed. Basics that each and every one of us know per ourselves in our own personal lives. Known by us from when we are little kids up until we die: How much cash we have; how much we bring in each year; our wealth improvement from year to year; the value of our investments; and our net worth.
The before mentioned as would apply for any local government, the population has been masterfully entertained or distracted to not have a cognitive thought about. A total vacuum and void was created for no discussion or even simple mention as would apply to your local government DUE TO THE MONEY INVOLVED! You were not intended to look at or grasp the basics. What the population was selectively confronted with was: "We are short of funds, we need to take more, higher and new taxation is needed.. Again, I say: The easiest way to steal money from someone is if the mark never knew they had the money in the first place.
---
Per those "Private" associations the following are a few examples that are utilized to influence and network just State Governors by consult into the collective common direction for profit and control of the masses under one standardized blue-print of corporate governance:
National Governors Association National Governors Association and NGA Center for Best Practices.
Democratic Governors Association The Democratic Governors' Association is an independent, voluntary political organization consisting of the Governors of the states and territories who are members of the Democratic Party.
Republican Governors Association Founded in 1963, the Republican Governors Association (RGA), is the official public policy and political organization of the Republican Governors of the United States.
Western Governors Association Serving the Governors of 21 States and US-Flag Pacific Islands.
Southern Governors Association Through the Southern Governors' Association (SGA), southern governors have a unique opportunity to exchange ideas, explore common issues, address pressing problems and promote regional accomplishments.
Midwestern Governors Conference Promoting interstate cooperation to strengthen the nation's heartland.
----
** Federal has their own grouping of Associations and Local Finance has their own also with acronym names such as GFOA (Government Financial Officers Association); GASB (Government Accounting Standards Board); FASB (Federal Accounting Standards Board).... Ever hear of them? They are rather large associations directing tens of thousands of local governments by consult, in effect creating the biggest all encompassing monopolies on Earth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a list of fifty of our country's State governors. My question to the CAFR1 National mailing list is:
How many of these State governors listed are attorneys? I doubt one in a thousand from the general population knows the answer to that question at first thought... In dire reality, 999 out of a thousand should know the answer to this question because in all reality and in all light their lives; future; and wealth maintained depend on knowing the answer, and then upon knowing, an effort must be made in controlling the outcome to that answer by their vote cast in the future.
By all means please reply back with the correct answer after you look and verify. We will see how many get the correct answer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE GOVERNORS
State Governor Spouse Party Website
Alabama Bob Riley Patsy Riley Republican Find out more
Alaska Sean Parnell Sandra Parnell Republican Find out more
Arizona Janice K. Brewer Dr. John Brewer Republican Find out more
Arkansas Michael Dale Beebe Ginger Beebe Democrat Find out more
California Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown, Jr. Anne Gust Brown Democrat Find out more
Colorado John Hickenlooper Helen Thorpe Democrat Find out more
Connecticut M. Jodi Rell Lou Rell Republican Find out more
Delaware Jack A. Markell Carla Markell Democrat Find out more
Florida Richard Lynn "Rick" Scott Ann Scott Republican Find out more
Georgia John Nathan Deal Sandra Deal Republican Find out more
Hawaii Neil Abercrombie Dr. Nancie Caraway Democrat Find out more
Idaho Clement Leroy "Butch" Otter Lori Easley Otter Republican Find out more
Illinois Pat Quinn Single Democrat Find out more
Indiana Mitchell E. Daniels Cheri Daniels Republican Find out more
Iowa Terry Edward Branstad Chris Branstad Republican Find out more
Kansas Samuel Dale "Sam" Brownback Stacy Parkinson Republican Find out more
Kentucky Steven L. Beshear Jane Beshear Democrat Find out more
Louisiana Bobby Jindal Supriya Jindal Republican Find out more
Maine Paul R. LePage Ann LePage Republican Find out more
Maryland Martin Joseph O'Malley Catherine Curran "Katie" O'Malley Democrat Find out more
Massachusetts Deval Laurdine Patrick Diane Bemus Patrick Democrat Find out more
Michigan Richard D. "Rick" Snyder Sue Snyder Republican Find out more
Minnesota Mark Brandt Dayton Single Democrat Find out more
Mississippi Haley Reeves Barbour Marsha Barbour Republican Find out more
Missouri Jeremiah Wilson "Jay" Nixon Georganne Nixon Democrat Find out more
Montana Brian David Schweitzer Nancy Schweitzer Democrat Find out more
Nebraska David Eugene "Dave" Heineman Sally Ganem Republican Find out more
Nevada Brian Edward Sandoval Kathleen Sandoval Republican Find out more
New Hampshire John H. Lynch Dr. Susan Lynch Democrat Find out more
New Jersey Christopher James "Chris" Christie Mary Pat Christie Republican Find out more
New Mexico Susana Martinez Chuck Franco Republican Find out more
New York Andrew Mark Cuomo Single Democrat Find out more
North Carolina Beverly Perdue Bob Eaves Democrat Find out more
North Dakota John "Jack" Dalrymple Betsy Dalrymple Republican Find out more
Ohio John Richard Kasich Karen Waldbillig Kasich Republican Find out more
Oklahoma Mary Fallin Wade Christensen Republican Find out more
Oregon John Albert Kitzhaber Single Democrat Find out more
Pennsylvania Thomas W. Corbett Susan Manbeck Corbett Republican Find out more
Rhode Island Lincoln Davenport Chafee Stephanie Chafee Independent Find out more
South Carolina Nimrata Nikki Randhawa Haley Michael Haley Republican Find out more
South Dakota Dennis M. Daugaard Linda Daugaard Republican Find out more
Tennessee William Edward "Bill" Haslam Crissy Haslam Republican Find out more
Texas James Richard "Rick" Perry Anita Perry Republican Find out more
Utah Gary Richard Herbert Jeanette Herbert Republican Find out more
Vermont Peter Shumlin Deborah Shumlin Democrat Find out more
Virginia Robert "Bob" McDonnell Maureen McDonnell Republican Find out more
Washington Christine Gregoire Michael Gregoire Democrat Find out more
West Virginia Earl Ray Tomblin Joanne Jaeger Tomblin Democrat Find out more
Wisconsin Scott Kevin Walker Tonette Walker Republican Find out more
Wyoming Matthew Hansen "Matt" Mead Carol Mintze Mead Republican Find out more
Due to the money involved the population was, is, and will continue to be masterfully entertained and spoon fed selective soundbite conditioning where in effect the majority from the population remain clueless as to the basics of the massive money; control; and wealth transfer involved here. The "Boys" in the alternative on the inside know very well the scope and size of the massive collective income; investments held; and the the control those investments held and income exert on the global economies and how they inherently determine the political structure derived therefrom.
The cooperative players greatly benefit, and those that object are systematically targeted for elimination. Thus for ease of operation and wealth transfer, great effort is applied by the controllers for never a mention made of the basics that would trigger a cognitive thought in the population's mind as to the "real" core basics driving the whole show.
I have provided the answer for final outcome to make the population the "First Line Beneficiary" with the application of the TRF where "all" clearly benefit, and all from government; financial; industrial; and service sectors prosper as they maintain their wealth and productivity through and by the elimination of all taxation.
The economies of the world currently are based on: Cash; Taxation; and Investment. What the TRF does is it bases the economies of the world on Cash and Investment 'only" for all time to come... and in true effect creates a prosperous and stable economy to boot..
Taxation is but a revenue source for government. The TRF replaces one revenue source (taxation) with two other revenue sources (investment and enterprise). The financial management teams are already in place to operate the TRF funds. The same teams that have been managing government's collective investment wealth now standing. The TRF is ready to happen all across the country from coast to coast. Can you feel the spirit of "true" corrective action moving ever so closer? On the brink of birth that will bring forward peace and prosperity for a thousand years to come?
For all of those religious zealots out there who profess: The "end of times are upon us." They seem to have conveniently forgotten one very important promise made. That being: "A thousand years of prosperity for one and all" (known as the millennium. In revelations the end of time is to come after the millennium has taken place. You see one and all, that promise has not yet happened. But no fear, I and others are working on it. It just might happen sooner than anyone expects..
It is about time to establish "Who Controls Whom". The gang of government and their private associations that have networked in secret to take it all over by investment and ever increasing secured income think they control the people and can benefit the people at their whims. I must say: Wrong!
It is the people who allow any institutional governing body to effect and influence their lives. Masterful entertainment as masterful grand theft took place may have worked all fine and dandy in the past for the last several hundred years or so, but no longer shall it be allowed to mask the cooperative Clan effort to facilitate the theft with the population being second line class citizens at best as they are continuously drained and managed.
We The People should, must, and will only accept being "First-Line-Beneficiaries" of the wealth we "allow" our government(s) to amass. For those from within government wanting to maintain business as usual and the population under the yoke as 2nd class citizens we are glad to say that our fore-fathers gave us the final say in the matter with the 2nd amendment to regain our rights as 1st class citizens if need be.
Things are not, nor shall they ever be as they should with the use of taxation as an ever increasing drain on the population and free market enterprise in this country,. It is time for a real change and a real change for the benefit of one and all.
Truly yours,
Walter J. Burien, Jr. - CAFR1.com
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936
Tel. (928) 458-5854
Government for the last ten-thousand years has always been: "Where the money is" and recently more money generated and held by each and every local and federal government operation than Midas ever dreamed about .
The population over the last ten-thousand years has suffered great threat and damage to their lives from the abuses that greed and opportunity produces through easy access from the inside walls of government from that wealth amassed and what its use can produce for a select group of inside players when no checks and balances are in place to avert such abuses.
Our fore-fathers created several barriers for government to keep the abuses in check. They wanted a centralized government but they also wanted a limited government. A centralized government that could network in time of war to protect the country and also network to maintain a strong economy where the population prospered.
The "States" and other local governments where allowed under the original organization structure to maintain their own houses under set general guidelines that applied to one and all. The three "Houses" of government were established to segregate power into three unique entities that could keep checks and balances in play to stop abuses of one branch by the corrective actions implemented from the other. The fore-fathers knew all to well that the old adage of: "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely was very true and was true to the severe detriment of the population.
One reality that has developed over the last several decades that circumvented our fore-fathers intent of limited government through the application of three branches of government was the merger of all three to be effectively networked as one.
This was done not by openly dissolving two but by takeover through common operating personnel of a selective "Clan" of controlling members now networked together to make the three houses one. That Clan is Attorneys / Lawyers. Seventy-percent on average of the elected officials (governors; Congress; Senate; Mayors; County Commissions) are now attorneys who effectively belong to the same club, having the same standardized mode of operation.
Most attorneys are not know for their benevolence and in the alternative stridently pursue liberating opponents of wealth to be utilized at "their" disposal. By nature this Clan sees the population as the opponent to be liberated of their wealth; controlled; and destroyed through the use of imposed edicts in the event they object.
Under this environment the population is at grave risk and will remain in grave risk as long as the prevalence of this circumstance prevails. That old expression of: "Well, you voted for the guy so you deserve what you get." is true on the surface but keep in mind this Clan intentionally does not promote the fact that they are attorneys.
In my guess ninety-percent of the people that vote do not even realize the person they are voting for is an attorney to their own disadvantage. The other ten-percent just don't even comprehend what the final effect is of establishing this type of Clan into power. A little collective consciousness on the part of the population in this regard is direly needed for corrective application.
The aspect of wealth maintained by government, our fore-fathers knew that if collective government had the ability to acquire all of the wealth of the country and its productivity value that they would do so if unrestrained. The checks and balances used here were along the lines of preventing monopolies from forming within the thousands of local governments that allowed them to act as one to become collective take-over giants by coordinated investing, targeting industry; finance; and service private corporations.
Local governments from the get-go had strict and standardized guidelines as to the scope and size of what they could acquire. Investment funds held by local governments were limited to not have more than 5% ownership by investment in any one company. They were required to invest 95% of their capital in the USA and restricted to 5% outside of the USA. Cash accounts were required to be diversified between several different locations. The ability to forcibly take land and possessions from the population were limited from the inception guidelines of the fore-fathers to be virtually nil except in the time of "domestic" invasion by war.
But, as has always been the case: When you have great wealth the potential for great theft is ever all so present.
In my short life of fifty-six years, what I have seen utilized prevalently to facilitate the massive theft that now permeates all of our lives boils down to three primary factors:
1. The population is kept masterfully entertained with good; bad; and dire consequential entertainment, cleverly orchestrated to keep the common population's thinking and mindset off in La-La land of distraction so that the reality of massive and also not so massive thefts play out unabated to conclusion for the converting of the wealth being stolen.
The syndicated media and controlled education were targeted rather effectively to that end and cooperate ruthlessly quite simply due to the money involved and how much of that money is easily made available to them.
Over the last decade I have had thousands of people make comment per the syndicated media of: "Why don't they do their jobs and report on this?" My reply is now always the same: "They do an excellent job, they do EXACTLY what they are paid to do."
If that news anchor steps out of line and makes simple mention of something that triggers a cognitive though in the viewers that is contrary to the controllers agenda, they are simply replaced with a young suck-up that will follow instructions. Ever wonder why the roll-over is so quick in news anchors now a day when in the past the anchors lasted for decades?
2. For local governments that have collective wealth, investment assets, and enterprise operations valued in the trillions of dollars held, the way they by-passed the monopoly limits per take-over of it all both domestic and internationally from the private sector for ultimate control and profit was by covertly creating "private" associations that were NGOs (Non Government Organizations) who by nature and intent kept very low profiles.
In doing so this gave the ability to network thousands of local governments acting now as one through the NGO associations to in effect circumvent the "individual" restrictions in place for those local governments. Keep in mind that both the "Democratic" and "Republican" parties are both NGO "Private Associations" created from the get-go to get their players in to have access and control over the massive til of wealth held under government trust. In conjuncture with human nature; greed; and opportunity, what was said or implied to the population by that local party or party representative had strictly the value of being: Giving them the ability to get their foot in and through the door. The intent on the other hand was to control the til and thus determine the policies set for its looting and use. The population has always been the second thought consideration.
3. I have noticed one prevalent tactic used of: Give the exact opposite impression of reality to accomplish the objective of looting and maintaining the wealth transfer. The easiest way to steal money from someone is if the mark never knew they had the money in the first place. Within the most corrupt local governments in current times crying poverty; need to reduce services (more for them); and then at the same time increase expenditures.
From 2008 to 2011 most crying poverty increased expenditures by 30% to say and justify they were short of funds and need to raise taxes. What is humorous when they cry shortfall and poverty is the FACT again: That they have more amassed wealth and annual income than Midas ever dreamed about. Kinda like Bill gates starting off with a million and increasing it to a hundred-billion over twenty-years, then taking a ten-billion dollar setback one year to ninety-billion, and crying poverty with the need to declare bankruptcy.
The biggest misrepresentation the general population falls prey to is the representations to the population that the government needs to give away money (trillions of dollars) to help the population. On the surface this may be true being that those trillions being spent by those who get it will help the majority of the population and help keep the economy rolling along from that money being spent.
BUT, the true underling intent is: Government collectively over the decades bought up most of the key energy; financial; and service "private sector" operations by investment. By releasing trillions of dollars from the til and tagging taxpayers to pay the bill over the next few decades, those trillions spent go directly into the profit margins of the "private sector" industrial; financial; and service corporations that government now collectively owns by investment with government now being the primary beneficiary as the principle stock holder and equity investor.
Government thus guarantees themselves being the "First Line Beneficiary" from the massive wealth transfer in end result. This keeps their bottom line, from their collective global investments being the largest owner collectively in the black... Get it? I hope so.. The Healthcare Bill; NAFTA; GATT; ect., were and are all designed to accomplish this specific end.
I am not going to go into here how they make trillions through the use of "short" derivatives by collapsing world markets, or make trillions as all think a collapse is imminent and the markets roll back up, but they do so, and do so very efficiently and well. Always keep in mind your entertainment good and bad with the soundbite conditioning you are spoon fed is designed for wealth transfer.. Your wealth into someone else's pocket.
I brought forward the application of the TRF that is designed to make the population the "First Line Beneficiary" through the phasing out of all taxation (property; personal; corporate; and sales) as the investment wealth growing in the TRF accounts drives the economy; government; financial cartels; and all within the population in a very prosperous fashion for the next thousand years, and I must say after a ten-year effort and tens of millions being reached with the idea, it is finally catching on.
I am expecting the first two counties to come online with the TRF in 2012. Thousands of other venues will follow in the short run by example. From start to finish in transitioning 80% of local government structures into the TRF mode of operation structure, I would expect the transition to take five to seven years to accomplish that end. Federal is a whole other story and will be a harder nut to crack per modifying their method of operation to meet general purpose operating funds. when the time comes, we will see what can be done there also.
3. The population being "trained" not to look and thus not comprehend. A complete vacuum and void was created in the populations cognitive thinking as to the "basics" of government wealth being amassed. Basics that each and every one of us know per ourselves in our own personal lives. Known by us from when we are little kids up until we die: How much cash we have; how much we bring in each year; our wealth improvement from year to year; the value of our investments; and our net worth.
The before mentioned as would apply for any local government, the population has been masterfully entertained or distracted to not have a cognitive thought about. A total vacuum and void was created for no discussion or even simple mention as would apply to your local government DUE TO THE MONEY INVOLVED! You were not intended to look at or grasp the basics. What the population was selectively confronted with was: "We are short of funds, we need to take more, higher and new taxation is needed.. Again, I say: The easiest way to steal money from someone is if the mark never knew they had the money in the first place.
---
Per those "Private" associations the following are a few examples that are utilized to influence and network just State Governors by consult into the collective common direction for profit and control of the masses under one standardized blue-print of corporate governance:
National Governors Association National Governors Association and NGA Center for Best Practices.
Democratic Governors Association The Democratic Governors' Association is an independent, voluntary political organization consisting of the Governors of the states and territories who are members of the Democratic Party.
Republican Governors Association Founded in 1963, the Republican Governors Association (RGA), is the official public policy and political organization of the Republican Governors of the United States.
Western Governors Association Serving the Governors of 21 States and US-Flag Pacific Islands.
Southern Governors Association Through the Southern Governors' Association (SGA), southern governors have a unique opportunity to exchange ideas, explore common issues, address pressing problems and promote regional accomplishments.
Midwestern Governors Conference Promoting interstate cooperation to strengthen the nation's heartland.
----
** Federal has their own grouping of Associations and Local Finance has their own also with acronym names such as GFOA (Government Financial Officers Association); GASB (Government Accounting Standards Board); FASB (Federal Accounting Standards Board).... Ever hear of them? They are rather large associations directing tens of thousands of local governments by consult, in effect creating the biggest all encompassing monopolies on Earth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a list of fifty of our country's State governors. My question to the CAFR1 National mailing list is:
How many of these State governors listed are attorneys? I doubt one in a thousand from the general population knows the answer to that question at first thought... In dire reality, 999 out of a thousand should know the answer to this question because in all reality and in all light their lives; future; and wealth maintained depend on knowing the answer, and then upon knowing, an effort must be made in controlling the outcome to that answer by their vote cast in the future.
By all means please reply back with the correct answer after you look and verify. We will see how many get the correct answer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE GOVERNORS
State Governor Spouse Party Website
Alabama Bob Riley Patsy Riley Republican Find out more
Alaska Sean Parnell Sandra Parnell Republican Find out more
Arizona Janice K. Brewer Dr. John Brewer Republican Find out more
Arkansas Michael Dale Beebe Ginger Beebe Democrat Find out more
California Edmund G. "Jerry" Brown, Jr. Anne Gust Brown Democrat Find out more
Colorado John Hickenlooper Helen Thorpe Democrat Find out more
Connecticut M. Jodi Rell Lou Rell Republican Find out more
Delaware Jack A. Markell Carla Markell Democrat Find out more
Florida Richard Lynn "Rick" Scott Ann Scott Republican Find out more
Georgia John Nathan Deal Sandra Deal Republican Find out more
Hawaii Neil Abercrombie Dr. Nancie Caraway Democrat Find out more
Idaho Clement Leroy "Butch" Otter Lori Easley Otter Republican Find out more
Illinois Pat Quinn Single Democrat Find out more
Indiana Mitchell E. Daniels Cheri Daniels Republican Find out more
Iowa Terry Edward Branstad Chris Branstad Republican Find out more
Kansas Samuel Dale "Sam" Brownback Stacy Parkinson Republican Find out more
Kentucky Steven L. Beshear Jane Beshear Democrat Find out more
Louisiana Bobby Jindal Supriya Jindal Republican Find out more
Maine Paul R. LePage Ann LePage Republican Find out more
Maryland Martin Joseph O'Malley Catherine Curran "Katie" O'Malley Democrat Find out more
Massachusetts Deval Laurdine Patrick Diane Bemus Patrick Democrat Find out more
Michigan Richard D. "Rick" Snyder Sue Snyder Republican Find out more
Minnesota Mark Brandt Dayton Single Democrat Find out more
Mississippi Haley Reeves Barbour Marsha Barbour Republican Find out more
Missouri Jeremiah Wilson "Jay" Nixon Georganne Nixon Democrat Find out more
Montana Brian David Schweitzer Nancy Schweitzer Democrat Find out more
Nebraska David Eugene "Dave" Heineman Sally Ganem Republican Find out more
Nevada Brian Edward Sandoval Kathleen Sandoval Republican Find out more
New Hampshire John H. Lynch Dr. Susan Lynch Democrat Find out more
New Jersey Christopher James "Chris" Christie Mary Pat Christie Republican Find out more
New Mexico Susana Martinez Chuck Franco Republican Find out more
New York Andrew Mark Cuomo Single Democrat Find out more
North Carolina Beverly Perdue Bob Eaves Democrat Find out more
North Dakota John "Jack" Dalrymple Betsy Dalrymple Republican Find out more
Ohio John Richard Kasich Karen Waldbillig Kasich Republican Find out more
Oklahoma Mary Fallin Wade Christensen Republican Find out more
Oregon John Albert Kitzhaber Single Democrat Find out more
Pennsylvania Thomas W. Corbett Susan Manbeck Corbett Republican Find out more
Rhode Island Lincoln Davenport Chafee Stephanie Chafee Independent Find out more
South Carolina Nimrata Nikki Randhawa Haley Michael Haley Republican Find out more
South Dakota Dennis M. Daugaard Linda Daugaard Republican Find out more
Tennessee William Edward "Bill" Haslam Crissy Haslam Republican Find out more
Texas James Richard "Rick" Perry Anita Perry Republican Find out more
Utah Gary Richard Herbert Jeanette Herbert Republican Find out more
Vermont Peter Shumlin Deborah Shumlin Democrat Find out more
Virginia Robert "Bob" McDonnell Maureen McDonnell Republican Find out more
Washington Christine Gregoire Michael Gregoire Democrat Find out more
West Virginia Earl Ray Tomblin Joanne Jaeger Tomblin Democrat Find out more
Wisconsin Scott Kevin Walker Tonette Walker Republican Find out more
Wyoming Matthew Hansen "Matt" Mead Carol Mintze Mead Republican Find out more
Due to the money involved the population was, is, and will continue to be masterfully entertained and spoon fed selective soundbite conditioning where in effect the majority from the population remain clueless as to the basics of the massive money; control; and wealth transfer involved here. The "Boys" in the alternative on the inside know very well the scope and size of the massive collective income; investments held; and the the control those investments held and income exert on the global economies and how they inherently determine the political structure derived therefrom.
The cooperative players greatly benefit, and those that object are systematically targeted for elimination. Thus for ease of operation and wealth transfer, great effort is applied by the controllers for never a mention made of the basics that would trigger a cognitive thought in the population's mind as to the "real" core basics driving the whole show.
I have provided the answer for final outcome to make the population the "First Line Beneficiary" with the application of the TRF where "all" clearly benefit, and all from government; financial; industrial; and service sectors prosper as they maintain their wealth and productivity through and by the elimination of all taxation.
The economies of the world currently are based on: Cash; Taxation; and Investment. What the TRF does is it bases the economies of the world on Cash and Investment 'only" for all time to come... and in true effect creates a prosperous and stable economy to boot..
Taxation is but a revenue source for government. The TRF replaces one revenue source (taxation) with two other revenue sources (investment and enterprise). The financial management teams are already in place to operate the TRF funds. The same teams that have been managing government's collective investment wealth now standing. The TRF is ready to happen all across the country from coast to coast. Can you feel the spirit of "true" corrective action moving ever so closer? On the brink of birth that will bring forward peace and prosperity for a thousand years to come?
For all of those religious zealots out there who profess: The "end of times are upon us." They seem to have conveniently forgotten one very important promise made. That being: "A thousand years of prosperity for one and all" (known as the millennium. In revelations the end of time is to come after the millennium has taken place. You see one and all, that promise has not yet happened. But no fear, I and others are working on it. It just might happen sooner than anyone expects..
It is about time to establish "Who Controls Whom". The gang of government and their private associations that have networked in secret to take it all over by investment and ever increasing secured income think they control the people and can benefit the people at their whims. I must say: Wrong!
It is the people who allow any institutional governing body to effect and influence their lives. Masterful entertainment as masterful grand theft took place may have worked all fine and dandy in the past for the last several hundred years or so, but no longer shall it be allowed to mask the cooperative Clan effort to facilitate the theft with the population being second line class citizens at best as they are continuously drained and managed.
We The People should, must, and will only accept being "First-Line-Beneficiaries" of the wealth we "allow" our government(s) to amass. For those from within government wanting to maintain business as usual and the population under the yoke as 2nd class citizens we are glad to say that our fore-fathers gave us the final say in the matter with the 2nd amendment to regain our rights as 1st class citizens if need be.
Things are not, nor shall they ever be as they should with the use of taxation as an ever increasing drain on the population and free market enterprise in this country,. It is time for a real change and a real change for the benefit of one and all.
Truly yours,
Walter J. Burien, Jr. - CAFR1.com
P. O. Box 2112
Saint Johns, AZ 85936
Tel. (928) 458-5854
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
